We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Annualised Return

Hi,

I have been researching information on funds recently, and I have come across the the term Annualised Return, in regards to a fund managers performance.

For example, on a website it stated that a fund managers annualised return over 11 years was 11%.

What exactly does this mean? Does it mean that if I had invested money in this fund, then, on average I would of seen my money grow 11% each year?

Or am I off the mark with this one guys? Any help/info would be much appreciated!

Comments

  • Reaper
    Reaper Posts: 7,357 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Yes, it translates growth into an annual figure. If the period is less than a year then it tells you what the growth would be if it continued at that rate for the rest of the year.

    If the period is more than a year then it tells you what the equivilent annual growth per year was.
  • xrjtg
    xrjtg Posts: 600 Forumite
    It means that if the fund had grown 11% every year for the 11 years then the return would have been the same as it was. Note that this isn't the same as the arithmetic mean of the percentage growth figures for each of the 11 years (it's a much more useful figure).
  • larry09
    larry09 Posts: 20 Forumite
    just for confirmation, are you are saying that the annualised return figure is the most useful?


    cheers.
  • xrjtg
    xrjtg Posts: 600 Forumite
    edited 3 June 2011 at 10:19PM
    Yes, the annualised return figure is more useful. If the fund rises 50% one year, then falls 30% the next, the annualised return is between 2 and 3%, which gives a more accurate picture than adding 50% to -30% and dividing by 2 to get 10%, a figure that doesn't really mean anything.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.