We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Variations to EA contract

TwistedPsycho
Posts: 971 Forumite
Quick question from talking to another vendor in my area (completely different part of the housing market thankfully).
Their property is on a guide price which is £250k to £265k. The EA has asked them if they would change it to £240k to £265k which they agreed to.
They received a new contract through the post while still in their tie-in stating the new facts but stating that they are back to day 1 of their tie-in...... surely if the EA has suggested marketing it at a value then has to change that because no one is offering then they should not have to be locked into a new tie in?
Their property is on a guide price which is £250k to £265k. The EA has asked them if they would change it to £240k to £265k which they agreed to.
They received a new contract through the post while still in their tie-in stating the new facts but stating that they are back to day 1 of their tie-in...... surely if the EA has suggested marketing it at a value then has to change that because no one is offering then they should not have to be locked into a new tie in?
Signaller, author, father, carer.
0
Comments
-
I would agree. Unless the vendors AGREE to the new contract.
My advice would be to return it with a covering note (keep a copy) saying they are happy with the original contract dated xx and do not wish to sign a new one.
How much longer does the original tie in have to run? If the EA makes a fuss about this, all the more reason to have nothing more to do with them, so, tell them to go back to the original price, sit out the remainder of the original contract, give notice (in good time!) and find a new agent.0 -
Yes, what G_M says. It looks to me like a sneaky way of extending the tie in more than a genuine change of the asking price. There is absolutley no need to sign or accept this new contract. The old one should be allowed to run, there is nothing wrong with doing that. If the EA makes the least bit of fuss about needing a new contract, if I were the vendor, I would give notice immediately.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards