We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Rights and Wrongs when making people redundant?

I've always read

"Its important to remember its the job thats be made redundant not you"

We recently had a few redundancies, I put in for mine and got turned down, so why am I doing a job of someone who got made redundant who didn't want to go? It wasn't the job that was made redundant it was the person, its been the same with the 10 or so other redundancies the jobs are still there, just more pressure on the rest of us to do our own jobs as well as those who have been made redundant.

Then we have the matrix used to pick people for redundancies, I thought those made redundant were allowed to see how this was worked out, No one has seen it, in fact we don't think one was used.

Comments

  • Googlewhacker
    Googlewhacker Posts: 3,887 Forumite
    cost is a big factor at the end of the day....
    The Googlewhacker referance is to Dave Gorman and not to my opinion of the search engine!

    If I give you advice it is only a view and always always take professional advice before acting!!!

    4 people on the ignore list....Bliss!
  • jazzyman01
    jazzyman01 Posts: 754 Forumite
    The Company will be wanting to save money. They should have gone through meaningful consultation. If they said they were using a matrix selection process then the individuals selected would be able to see the matrix and their scoring. They could ask to see other scores, but not the names.

    When asking for volunteers, it may well be that your scores were significantly higher than the others and that you may have a skill set that is essential therefore they could not accept your VR.

    What the Company will be saying is that there were say 12 posts and they actually do not need 12 people to do the jobs but there may be some tasks that have to be reallocated but the majority of the role has gone.
  • heretolearn_2
    heretolearn_2 Posts: 3,565 Forumite
    You are confusing 'job' - as in someone's employed role, and 'job' as in task.

    The jobs have gone even though the tasks have remained and have been redistributed to other employees, So their job has gone, and your job contract has changed (which is another matter altogether). If it were just the person and not the job gone, the company would have had to replace them with a new member of staff.

    If we decided to cut costs by making our receptionist redundant, then the job as in all the tasks remain - we still have to answer the phone, greet visitors, deal with the post etc. But the job as in a specific single person doing all that as their role, has gone. We'd split all those tasks among remaining staff.
    Cash not ash from January 2nd 2011: £2565.:j

    OU student: A103 , A215 , A316 all done. Currently A230 all leading to an English Literature degree.

    Any advice given is as an individual, not as a representative of my firm.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 346.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 238.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 613.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 174.6K Life & Family
  • 251.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.