We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Interest rates to rise again
Comments
-
Quite right George, increasing house prices keep the debt-wagon rolling for a few more years. However, these increases and the increasing difference between inflation of essentials and non-essentials is starting to bite. We seem to be in the position where wages can't go up much without IRs following, but consumption has to...0
-
Gorgeous_George wrote:Why they would wish to keep house prices under control is the big question.
Because if they dont, eventually no one can afford them therefore there is very little movement, there is no one earning out of it all, the government included. Keeping the system sensible may mean lower short term profit, but it guarantees sustainable long term outcomes.2 + 2 = 4
except for the general public when it can mean whatever they want it to.0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote:They could do so very easily. Increase interest rates when prices start to rise and decrease them when prices fall. Alternatively, increasing income tax would be even more effective.
As for income tax, high rates just make people avoid it. It doesn't stop them buying houses, the current tax take proves that.talksalot81 wrote:Because if they dont, eventually no one can afford them therefore there is very little movement, there is no one earning out of it all, the government included. Keeping the system sensible may mean lower short term profit, but it guarantees sustainable long term outcomes.But they don't. The market takes care of the "eventually no one can afford them". You might not like how it happens but it will happen.
A house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
I'm not conviced a drop in house prices will do anyone any good apart from FTB's - Why you might ask..... well
As above the government do well out of higer house prices - VAT on services, Stamp Duty, Inheritance tax, Council Tax etc etc. Therfore if prices drop then EVERYONE will be taxed higher to cover this shorfall in one way or another.
So perhaps high house prices are good for the majority of people?0 -
BobProperty wrote:
But they don't. The market takes care of the "eventually no one can afford them". You might not like how it happens but it will happen.
Where is your confusion. You rightly state that they dont. So the logical consequence is that prices will continue rising, the difference between price and income will get wider until your income becomes all but irrelevant for most people so they cannot purchase. That is HOW it would happen... but it cant continue to happen once that point is reached - else where is the money coming from to fuel further growth?!2 + 2 = 4
except for the general public when it can mean whatever they want it to.0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote:Why they would wish to keep house prices under control is the big question.talksalot81 wrote:Because if they dont, eventually no one can afford them therefore there is very little movement, there is no one earning out of it all, the government included. Keeping the system sensible may mean lower short term profit, but it guarantees sustainable long term outcomes.talksalot81 wrote:Where is your confusion. You rightly state that they dont. So the logical consequence is that prices will continue rising, the difference between price and income will get wider until your income becomes all but irrelevant for most people so they cannot purchase. That is HOW it would happen... but it cant continue to happen once that point is reached - else where is the money coming from to fuel further growth?!A house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
The BoE has to be aware of house prices etc, but their aim is to keep CPI at 2%, right now, they are overshooting it substantially, with a sudden & marked rise last month.
Despite the early sales (did we not have those last year?) my guess: +25bp in January.
Everything I can see is pointing to it, M4 money supply at 14%, unemployment down, CPI up, wages up."Mrs. Pench, you've won the car contest, would you like a triumph spitfire or 3000 in cash?" He smiled.
Mrs. Pench took the money. "What will you do with it all? Not that it's any of my business," he giggled.
"I think I'll become an alcoholic," said Betty.0 -
Sorry folks I don't see rates rising above 5%, the MPC want to control inflation, house prices are peripheral. The current rate of inflation is expected, it will start to come down next year quite possibly negating any requirement for further increases.
Rubbish. Two interest rises are already priced in. What exactly do you see coming down in price. Who is going to settle for a 2% increase in wages in January when the real rate of inflation is more like 10%.
This government has to go....the sooner the better.0 -
BobProperty wrote:My only confusion is you first implying that the government does try to keep house prices under control then saying:
Your quotes answer your query.
I responded to someone with the reason why the government would WISH to keep prices under control. This was also in response to a post suggesting why they would NOT wish to keep them under control. At no point did I say that they actually did it... because I know they dont!2 + 2 = 4
except for the general public when it can mean whatever they want it to.0 -
I'm trying to decide between a fixed rate or variable mortgage. If the interest rate went up to 6 or 7% I think I'd be ok but if it became over 8% in the next few years i'd be struggling - hence I'm considering a fixed rate - do you think interest rates could hit 8% in the next few years?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards