We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Help regarding abandoned development near home
Comments
-
crazyhaggid wrote: »This is the reply I got from my local planning department:
"I visited the site and although the site is not tidy, there is no remit within planning enforcement to pursue the developer as it is not considered to be that serious that we could take any notice against them.
The heras fencing is adequate when this type of work is ongoing.
Although the developers as you say have not been on site for some considerable time they are not in breach of any conditions. They have started within the time limit and there is no completion date."
From what I've read here is this wrong?
I would be thinking you have been fobbed with a stock email reply... Your first post on this subject was 10.12 pm yesterday, how have the council really been round and inspected the site and got back to you on a Sunday of a Bank Holiday weekend so quickly?
Your next port of call would be your local councillor, tell him the Planning department are fobbing you off and you think you saw kids on the site from your top window..... :cool:0 -
I would be thinking you have been fobbed with a stock email reply... Your first post on this subject was 10.12 pm yesterday, how have the council really been round and inspected the site and got back to you on a Sunday of a Bank Holiday weekend so quickly?
Your next port of call would be your local councillor, tell him the Planning department are fobbing you off and you think you saw kids on the site from your top window..... :cool:
Thanks for the reply, I think there's a bit of confusion here I said in my first post I had contacted the planning department and they had said no to my request, I just found and posted the actual reply.
Contacting my councillor sounds like a good idea.0 -
I am fully expecting that sort of reply too - if they even bother. My next step would be my local councillor - suggest you take that route also. You could also try your local paper.0
-
crazyhaggid wrote: »Thanks for the reply, I think there's a bit of confusion here I said in my first post I had contacted the planning department and they had said no to my request, I just found and posted the actual reply.
Contacting my councillor sounds like a good idea.
My apologies.
Is the hoarding around the site in good repair? Building firms have an implicit duty of care to ensure their sites are secure and safe, perversely even from trespassers. If they think kids are getting access then there will be more of an effort to try and do something.
I would also look up the definition of 'starting work' in the legal sense of expiry of planning applications. As I understand it this has to be a real effort towards the development and not simply clearing/demolishing the site.
The problem stems from the lack of a property tax on empty properties. If any government had the balls to introduce such a thing then all the empty houses across the UK would be returned to the use they were intended for PDQ.
My experience of Local Authority planning departments is that some of them are woefully inefficient. I used to live in a London Boro. Some of my neighbours in that Boro were building granny flats and all sorts in their back gardens without Planning Permissions and the LA simply wasn't interested. One over the back from where I used to live put a a two storey structure with a front door with letterbox, the full works. I even sent them photographs of the bathroom suite being delivered though the upstairs window (before they had put the window in) and still they did not investigate!!
Good luck you are going to need it..........0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards