We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Household bills hit 3 year high

124»

Comments

  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    do you want to send me a PM, i may be able to help you and help you get through this.

    you sound quite upset. :(

    No thanks chucky, I think I'll be OK.

    In fact, I'm not upset, just trying to get involved in the discussion.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • LittleMissAspie
    LittleMissAspie Posts: 2,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    chucky wrote: »
    so would increasing BoE rates reduce the cost all of the other items on your list?
    No. If the other items continue to increase as they have been doing, plus we have increased mortgage costs due to increased rates, then that -3.5 could turn into +10 or more.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    such kind words...

    so would increasing BoE rates reduce the cost all of the other items on your list?

    I know you want an answer from Graham, but I would just like to say that for those awful people with savings, an increase in base rates might help a little. It may even bring the cost down of anything or service that is imported. What it may also do is delay or limit the extent of any future property boom. That can't be a bad thing, can it ?
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DervProf wrote: »
    I know you want an answer from Graham, but I would just like to say that for those awful people with savings, an increase in base rates might help a little. It may even bring the cost down of anything or service that is imported. What it may also do is delay or limit the extent of any future property boom. That can't be a bad thing, can it ?
    oh ok so we're talking about future property booms and not the cost of living now.

    it's bad news for savers, maybe they should have a warning on savings account saying that returns could fluctuate depending on interest rates. didn't they understand that the interest rates go up and down?

    base rate manipulation isn't probably the best tool to manage inflation right now. the BoE will probably increase rates to 'normal' levels too late anyway
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    base rate manipulation isn't probably the best tool to manage inflation right now.

    Because they didn't use it control inflation in the first place. The BoE backed themselves into a corner by going for the "easy option" and slashing rates at the first sign of trouble. It didn't leave them much room for manouvre.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DervProf wrote: »
    Because they didn't use it control inflation in the first place. The BoE backed themselves into a corner by going for the "easy option" and slashing rates at the first sign of trouble. It didn't leave them much room for manouvre.
    no

    they had to decrease rates because they wanted to implement QE.
    QE couldn't be implemented otherwise.

    the way that QE worked it basically was a tool to do the same thing as reducing rates.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.