We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Help/Advice Needed - Tenant wanting break agreement!
Comments
-
princeofpounds wrote: »For instance, let's say T paid a deposit as part of the agreement. But then both parties agree that T will forfeit the deposit for surrender. Fine. But then T takes landlord to deposit arbitration. LL can't prove any damage. Arbitration might award deposit to T anyway as it is under their scheme.
If landlord shows the signed Deed by which T accepts to forfeit the deposit I don't see how this scenario could happen.0 -
If the surrender were executed in contractual form, the T could later argue that it was void through lack of consideration (i.e. T got nothing of value in exchange). If it is executed as a deed, T cannot use this argument to dispute its validity.princeofpounds wrote: »Actually, what you have said is a fair point, but if monetary amounts are being demanded in compensation then there is a consideration, or alternatively it is just the amendment of an already-existing contract, so I'm not sure it's quite so simple.
In any case a deed is fine if you can get one out of the situation.0 -
princeofpounds wrote: »Actually, what you have said is a fair point, but if monetary amounts are being demanded in compensation then there is a consideration, or alternatively it is just the amendment of an already-existing contract, so I'm not sure it's quite so simple.
In any case a deed is fine if you can get one out of the situation.
No, of course not. But you are missing an important distinction on the deposit; that it already is set aside as a deposit for a contractual arrangement. So it's not necessarily unemcumbered money to be bounced around.
For instance, let's say T paid a deposit as part of the agreement. But then both parties agree that T will forfeit the deposit for surrender. Fine. But then T takes landlord to deposit arbitration. LL can't prove any damage. Arbitration might award deposit to T anyway as it is under their scheme.
Or T agree LL can have deposit. LL re-enters house on surrender of tenancy and finds that T has stolen fittings to value in excess of deposit. LL no longer has address for T - what now?
Agreeing a sum of money equal to the deposit fine, just be aware that the deposit isn't under your direct control at all points and has rules on its use separate to what you may wish to do with it.
I am aware totally that it remains their money until such agreement is made and if any such arbitration agrees or disagrees and i'm willing to go throught hat process if necessary.
I simply meant that by forfeting us the deposit they wouldn't need to find another sum equal to a months rent because it was right there. They can happily have the deposit back following an inspection and if there is any damage, things missing, cleaning to be done we can request that be taken from it before the remainder is released to them, not an issue, happy to do so, but that means also they need to find us a further £475 from somewhere.
Just seemed the easier of the two options IMO but may be its not, may be i should just take normal costs if any incurred and request they pay us 3 months in lieu as people have suggested. Same amount just got to a different way.
If that happened i could instigate legal proceedings for theft through the police i believe and/or small claims court still if i was able to provide proof the items didn't belong to them - which i can as i have a signed inventory and photos of all fixtures and fittings etc.0 -
may I suggest that pursuing small claims court isn't that expensive if it comes to it? I mean if they were not to leave (& hand back the keys) you would have to do so anyway to get poesssion back.
By the waywould it be worth serving an s21 notice for the end of the tennancy? Or at least make sure you don't forget to do this.
By the way the story does not sound very credible: redundancy without any proof? Surely the employer has to let them know in writing? And they now want to move out more or less immediately ... Seem to me they found somewhere better and want to get out of paying.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards