We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Offer advice please!

Bit of advice required on our bidding strategy!

Background:

A couple of weeks ago we found a property we liked and put in an offer £30k under asking price (the asking price was around 450k). This was rejected by the seller, and the EA said there was one other bidder so we had 2 days to make our 'best and final offer'. We were quite cautious but pushed up to 20k under asking price, reasoning that we weren't too bothered if we didn't get it.

EA told us that the other person's 'best and final offer' was higher and so the vendor had gone with that one. Fine.

A week or so later (today) the estate agent called us up to say that the sale had fallen through (apparently the survey came back fine but the buyer had financial difficulties), and would we like to make another offer. I told him that our existing offer still stood. He said that we would have to increase our offer to something near the other offer, which he hinted was around 5k under asking price.

Because we've done a lot more viewings in the last couple of weeks, we now think we were a bit cautious in making our 'best and final' offer last time round. However, obviously we don't want to pay more than I have to, so am tempted to go in with only a slight increase to our previous offer, maybe 15k under asking price.

Just interested to see what people think really? Are we still being too cautious? I have this nagging feeling that this other buyer may never have existed in the first place (although no evidence for that either way), or that there's some sort of horrendous problem with the place that came up on survey, but maybe just paranoia!

Any and all advice welcomed...
«1

Comments

  • justjohn
    justjohn Posts: 2,260 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    dont offer anymore
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,493 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It depends how much you want it. You could just stand your ground and see what happens. They may well take it.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • moesasji
    moesasji Posts: 52 Forumite
    My feeling is that you are being played by the EA....the market is dead as there are not that many people around that can borrow this kind of money.

    Anyway the only thing that you are talking about is asking prices. A seller can ask for the moon, so do your own research and base your judgement on those hard facts! So for how much have comparable properties in that area recently sold? You can easily find this using nethouseprices.com for example
  • hcb42
    hcb42 Posts: 5,962 Forumite
    I would stand firm. Your offer is still the best offer - that can actually proceed - that the vendor has.

    The other offer was not worth the proverbial paper it was printed on if the buyer cannot come good on the deal.

    THey will ring you back.
  • Alejandro
    Alejandro Posts: 65 Forumite
    Thanks for advice. I probably should have pointed out that it's in london, so 450k isn't actually that expensive (it's only a 3 bed flat!). I don't think the asking price is unreasonable, based on what I've seen other properties advertised at/selling for, but obviously every property is different, especially in London where places vary so much from one road to the next, so it's hard to be certain.

    Incidentally there's one other thing that's bugging me. The flat is one of 6 in the building and it will be a share of freehold. However the arrangements between the various owners is that each flat pays a proportion of the maintenance costs based on its floor area, which means that 'our' flat pays a lot more than all the other flats. I just wondered whether that is normal (rather than splitting based on, say, number of people living in each flat, or just splitting equally), and also whether I necessarily have to sign up to the arrangement or whether its just an agreement between the existing owners. Not too sure how these things normally work. Also, what happens if the owners don't agree about the work to be done? At the moment they have an '8 year plan' for all the maintenance work, which includes replacing windows etc and requires 'our' flat to contribute over £200 per month!
  • hcb42
    hcb42 Posts: 5,962 Forumite
    sheesh =- £200 a month.

    I dont have any experience, other than to say there is no "fair" way...based on sqm or occupancy or bedrooms etc - someone will always be worse off.

    £200 a month is a lot though. I would be buying a house, not a flat for £450k - then again I don't live in central London!
  • geoffky
    geoffky Posts: 6,835 Forumite
    you are being played...simple as that...you fell for it the first time.
    It is nice to see the value of your house going up'' Why ?
    Unless you are planning to sell up and not live anywhere, I can;t see the advantage.
    If you are planning to upsize the new house will cost more.
    If you are planning to downsize your new house will cost more than it should
    If you are trying to buy your first house its almost impossible.
  • suebfg
    suebfg Posts: 404 Forumite
    Not sure if this is helpful or not, but we've been told twice by estate agents recently that there is an offer on this property or that, hence putting us under pressure to make our minds up very quickly.

    In both cases, we haven't put in offers and weeks on, neither property is under offer or sold stc.
  • Alejandro
    Alejandro Posts: 65 Forumite
    Thanks guys. Geoffky - clearly you know your stuff, so i'd be interested to hear your reasoning as to why we're "being played". I've been trying to work that out, but I didn't think it was as obvious as you clearly seem to think, so would be grateful for some more insight.

    I came to the conclusion that they were probably genuine, because if I was in the seller's position and only had one potential buyer on the cards, I don't think I would risk losing them by leaving them waiting for over a week between rejecting their offer and coming back to them (we've seen quite a few properties in the meantime since having our offer rejected, and it's only coincidence that we haven't happened to find anywhere appropriate). If they'd come back to us the next day, I'd have been a lot more suspicious.
  • Alejandro
    Alejandro Posts: 65 Forumite
    hcb42 wrote: »
    sheesh =- £200 a month.

    I dont have any experience, other than to say there is no "fair" way...based on sqm or occupancy or bedrooms etc - someone will always be worse off.

    £200 a month is a lot though. I would be buying a house, not a flat for £450k - then again I don't live in central London!

    Yes, the £200 a month certainly concerns me. On the plus side, none of it goes to a managing agent or anything, so it does all go into improvements/repairs etc, and the building was clearly very well maintained.

    And I daresay I'd feel differently about the cost allocation if I was in the smallest flat rather than the largest! I'm just trying to figure out whether I'd be tied in to that arrangement or whether i'd have any chance to renegotiate with the other owners.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.