We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Proposed Mortgage Broker Code of Conduct
Options
Comments
-
I will try and come up with a nice font and format.
OK as for what people can say they are. Let me ask the question another way.
I don't want to include 'insurance' in there (it confuses things a bit).
So if we just say mortgage broker. Who does that term not extend to that it should extent to. Could a mortgage IFA effectively not be covered by that description? Or is that passing off/compliance poor?
As for 'regulatory status' rather than 'mortgage broker' status. There are two reasons I would prefer to stick with mortgage broker
1. I think people understand the term better
2. It could imply that I had checked that you were a mortgage broker, but not checked your regulatory status. Whereas this isn't the case
As for the I rather than you. Absolutely
MartinMartin Lewis, Money Saving Expert.
Please note, answers don't constitute financial advice, it is based on generalised journalistic research. Always ensure any decision is made with regards to your own individual circumstance.Don't miss out on urgent MoneySaving, get my weekly e-mail at www.moneysavingexpert.com/tips.Debt-Free Wannabee Official Nerd Club: (Honorary) Members number 0000 -
MSE_Martin wrote:I will try and come up with a nice font and format.
OK as for what people can say they are. Let me ask the question another way.
I don't want to include 'insurance' in there (it confuses things a bit).
So if we just say mortgage broker. Who does that term not extend to that it should extent to. Could a mortgage IFA effectively not be covered by that description? Or is that passing off/compliance poor?
As for 'regulatory status' rather than 'mortgage broker' status. There are two reasons I would prefer to stick with mortgage broker
1. I think people understand the term better
2. It could imply that I had checked that you were a mortgage broker, but not checked your regulatory status. Whereas this isn't the case
As for the I rather than you. Absolutely
Martin
Agreed , given that no advice is actually given, the term "mortgage broker" should be enough to alert Joe Public that your in the business.
Hopefully we can get this knocked on the head asap.
Ps lucky enough to catch Matthew Wright this morning - very entertaining;)0 -
"mortgage broker" is fine by me, can't see there's a regulatory issue as this is not an advert or promotionI am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it.This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser code of conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0
-
Hmmmmmm
I like to keep things simple and am all for using one term ie: Mortgage Broker.
The only trouble I have with this is that it does convey an impression of having knowledge of several different companies or lenders. As in the term "Insurance Broker"
There are some excellent advisers here that work for the banks and building soceities who I would find hard to describe as brokers therefore. I would correctly call them Mortgage Advisers.
Does that make sense or is it just me ?
Now I know the problems the FSA had when they dreamt this all up !0 -
Further to the above perhaps it's time to coin a new phrase, a "Mortgage Professional" which alerts readers to the fact that you are involved in the business but doesn't distinguish between "broker" or "adviser"
Regards0 -
Does that mean we need to change the "Mortgage BrokerssCode" to the " Mortgage Professionals Code" ................never mind five minutes and im off to the pub:beer:0
-
Happy to go with flow over
does not check my "mortgage broker status"
although if not using "regulatory status" , perhaps just " status" or "status as a broker" is less clumsy
My thoughts on various names were based on people posting on different boards / when you extend it to IFAs
Compliance view - The FSA guide to advisers is very much based firstly on product range : ( 1, 2 or 3 of )
Mortgage
Insurance OR
Investment (financial advisers)
Adding the term independent is only allowed by those advising within certain guidelines (WoM / fee option), and term IFA is usually only used if these are met plus at least an investment service is provided.
--
so if including insurance complicates - and with Leon's good point -
that leaves
Mortgage Adviser for now ??Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as (financial) advice.0 -
Re the signature why not just say something like
I subscribe to the MSE mortgage brokers' Code of Conduct(linked).Comments are for information and discussion and are not financial advice.Trying to keep it simple...0 -
Quite like that idea Ed. Keeps it extremely simple.
Regards0 -
EdInvestor wrote:Re the signature why not just say something like
Yes I like that ,it performs a few functions,and the poster is alerted immediately to the ethics,which adds status.I feel that it is important to give the person information ,they might be new to the site and they could be vulnerable,so the realisation that they are protected by the code is important.[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]To be happy you need to make someone happy.[/FONT]0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards