We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
If life expectancy remained the same and there was no immigration or emigration and each couple had 2 children the population would stay the same.
But it isnt staying the same its increasing, there are various reasons why its increasing but the end result is the same. The population is increasing.
But it isnt staying the same its increasing, there are various reasons why its increasing but the end result is the same. The population is increasing.
True and whether that is good or bad is a matter of opinion I’m undecided at the moment. But the causes are immigration and life expectancy not birth rate. Don’t get me wrong I don’t think people should be able to have as many children as they want and expect the state to pick up the bill at least we can agree on that..
