We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
NHS Pension worth it?
Comments
-
geoffgeofftygeoff wrote: »...and which group of taxpayers are forced to pay this? None.
There we go.
Irrelevant, You said you "don't want to pay for other people's company pensions". Unless you only shop at companies that don't provide a company pension (which will be near impossible if/when NEST comes on line) you are paying for other peoples company pension. Even if you avoid that you are still paying for the employees personal pensions0 -
i just googled... NHS is 4th. Walmart, Indian Railways, China National Petroleum then NHS.
http://www.rediff.com/business/slide-show/slide-show-1-the-worlds-biggest-employers/20101207.htm
I thought the Chinese army was ahead as well?0 -
Yes, there's a need for an NHS. But how that NHS can have grown so ridiculously unwieldy as to be the third largest employer in the world is a national disgrace, and testament to its innate inefficiencies.
Let's get this into perspective. It is the third largest employer in the world, after the Peoples Liberation Army in China (population 1.35 bn), the State Railway Corporation in India (population 1.2bn).
The population of the UK is, what? 60m.
It's totally ridiculous.
You forget we have a integrated heath care service mainly under one employer the NHS.
Other countries like the USA have similar ratios of doctor/nurses per capita as the UK so will be employing more people to provide the service just with multiple employers.0 -
Follow it through right to the end bendix. Anyone who receives their income solely from the state does not pay one net penny in tax, either direct or indirect, as every penny they receive has come from the state. It's a book keeping exercise.
I am not saying what they (some of them) do is without value to society as a whole but they don't 'pay' tax in to the system.
In that case could I have my salary tax free as it will make no difference
0 -
Anyway, to the OPs question. The new NHS pension is no longer a final salary one but i still think its worth it.
Its close enough to final salary for discussion though (as oposed to a carear average scheme) , the difference between best 12 consecutive months in last 3(?) years and average of best 36 months in last 10 years is marginal - effectively thats penultimate salary or even closer if you've bounced off the top of the pay scale for a few years0 -
Irrelevant, You said you "don't want to pay for other people's company pensions". Unless you only shop at companies that don't provide a company pension (which will be near impossible if/when NEST comes on line) you are paying for other peoples company pension. Even if you avoid that you are still paying for the employees personal pensions
Not irrelevant. There is a big difference in that choice comes into it and Tesco have to afford their own pension scheme. It can't be based on la-la mathematics where the budget consists of other people's money who have no choice in the matter.
I would actually be happy contributing to the employer's part of the pension if the amount was known. By that, I mean it should be defined contribution (say 10% from the employer to be generous) not defined benefit.
I am entirely unhappy with the ridiculous situation where the employer (in effect us) takes an unknown and unlimited risk (in the sense that the increase in public sector employees has been out of control) so that the next generation can pay for the overspend of the past.0 -
I've decided I need to find a job the NHS. At 40 its not too late for me to join the gravy train.0
-
Its close enough to final salary for discussion though (as oposed to a carear average scheme) , the difference between best 12 consecutive months in last 3(?) years and average of best 36 months in last 10 years is marginal - effectively thats penultimate salary or even closer if you've bounced off the top of the pay scale for a few years
It is now much harder to do the pension boost by doing nights or going part time and only doing sundays/bank holidays.
A Nurse could boost their pension by ~ 30% over normal pay by selective working.
The new scheme makes it easer to down grade jobs approaching retirement.
One good thing is those that retired from the old scheme can rejoin the new scheme if they go back to work.0 -
getmore4less wrote: »It is one benifits that helps many NHS workers tolerate the low pay.
And helps a much higher number of overpaid NHS workers.0 -
getmore4less wrote: »It is one benifits that helps many NHS workers tolerate the low pay.
Nhs pay post agenda for change is not low on a like for like basis with private sector jobs. Add in the many other good terms and conditions and it is a very attractive package.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards