We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Finally my MP writes back about the CSA
Comments
-
++
Perhaps somebody could tell the BBC that then..?My source told me that this is not the case as they are to set up a section just for the arrears cases
Mind you be interesting to see exactly what the new arrangement will mean for everyone involved...
++0 -
I think that if they do decide that it aint worth chasing them due to costs etc, they should compensate the pwcs with the amount owed to them for non collection. This would only apply to those cases who already have arrears owed. They could write off the amount owed to the state as they have already paid it anyway, so it would not be cost effective to continue to chase these cases where the nrp isn't paying but it would be highly unfair if private pwcs whose nrps have racked up large arrears should have to go without. Win for pwc, win for nrp, lose to the taxpayer, who wouldn't notice it on a weekly basis anyway AND it would only be a one off.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards