PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Moving Home - Zoopla Hurts!

Options
13468921

Comments

  • katepnlo
    katepnlo Posts: 391 Forumite
    Nothing to add about the price as i do think you are stuck there for a long time :?
    Just wanted to say, a child does NOT need a ton of stuff at all. I have 4 children and by the time i had my 4th i realised that 90% of what you see in shops really is not needed in the slightest.
    You could have a baby and quite comfortably not need a second bedroom for a year as long as you could fit a cot in your room.

    Nappies, sling, boobs,clothes,somewhere for baby to sleep. Its 6m before they can start solids and as long as you have a good healthy diet they can have what you have
  • geoffky
    geoffky Posts: 6,835 Forumite
    You are kidding yourself..its worth 51k the same as ALL the others sold for....only a village idiot would pay more..
    It is nice to see the value of your house going up'' Why ?
    Unless you are planning to sell up and not live anywhere, I can;t see the advantage.
    If you are planning to upsize the new house will cost more.
    If you are planning to downsize your new house will cost more than it should
    If you are trying to buy your first house its almost impossible.
  • KateLiana27
    KateLiana27 Posts: 707 Forumite
    Another vote here for starting your family if you're ready, and not make it contingent on moving house. Such pressures will only make you make hasty decisions and that's never good in the house selling/buying process. Babies really don't take up much room :)
  • ceridwen
    ceridwen Posts: 11,547 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    geoffky wrote: »
    You are kidding yourself..its worth 51k the same as ALL the others sold for....only a village idiot would pay more..

    I think thats a bit harsh - as it is a nice-looking flat - certainly well presentable.

    Its just that these are clearly very awkward circumstances for OP to be in.

    I DO have to say though - that I disagree with going ahead and having a child regardless of the fact that the home isnt big enough for one. Personally - I DO have to say that I dont rate OP's chances of getting out of that flat into a bigger home within a matter of months. It aint gonna happen - and I do understand the recommendation to "Go ahead anyway" - but I seriously dont think its realistic in the circumstances.
  • poppy10_2
    poppy10_2 Posts: 6,588 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ceridwen wrote: »
    I think thats a bit harsh - as it is a nice-looking flat - certainly well presentable.
    I agree it's a lovely flat. But you can't really argue with the cold hard figures:

    YewiL.png


    Sad fact is, the flat simply isn't worth what the OP paid for it. The price was deliberately inflated using the government's HomeBuy scheme, which purports to help first time buyers get on the ladder, but instead provides a tax-payer funded subsidy to the developers while tying vulnerable buyers into taking huge mortgages on overpriced properties that end up in negative equity as soon as they walk in.
    I feel sorry for the OP for having been conned by this scam, but it's hard to see a way out. There's no point in putting it on at an unrealistic price and stating that you need the money to clear your mortgage - potential buyers don't care what you owe or what your requirement are, they aren't going to pay £20-£30k over the going rate for no reason.
    poppy10
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,697 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If you can rubbish your Zoopla valuation down, why not fiddle it back up?

    Probably won't get you a buyer, but you would feel you were doing something.

    I was in £20,000 negative equity in the 90s. It didn't go overnight, but gradually every year it seemed prices had risen another £10,000. Finally took £120,000 equity when we sold. If you can look long term, things do get better.

    Definitely the right way to look at it. We had a 1 bed starter home, bought for £60k in 1989. Dropped to £30k in around 1993/4, we sold for £42k in 1998 to fund our current house. At the peak in 2006/7 they were then selling for £120k

    Time makes a big difference if you can wait.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • dopester
    dopester Posts: 4,890 Forumite
    poppy10 wrote: »
    The price was deliberately inflated using the government's HomeBuy scheme, which purports to help first time buyers get on the ladder, but instead provides a tax-payer funded subsidy to the developers while tying vulnerable buyers into taking huge mortgages on overpriced properties that end up in negative equity as soon as they walk in.
    I feel sorry for the OP for having been conned by this scam, but it's hard to see a way out.

    Same. I'm going to be generous and seeing they were one of the earliest buyers (from your screenie) that they were led to believe the other flats would be bought for around the same price they had paid - during the selling stage.

    HomeBuySkyHigh. I've got no helpful suggestions so am keeping my mouth shut so to speak. Hope you get an unexpected lucky windfall or something, to help you get out of your situation.
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,565 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Ultimately, your flat is worth £51k. You are not going to get any more than that, so although that's not what you want to hear, it's just going to be easier to accept it. Who knows what house prices are going to do, but I very much doubt they're going to rise more than a couple of % a year...

    Your options are:

    1. Borrow money from a relative to pay your way out the debt, then rent yourself a 2 bedroom property, big enough to start a family.

    2. Accept that you'll be stuck in that flat for the next 5 years, and adapt it. Babies really don't take up too much space. If needs be, get yourself one of those cabin beds where below it you can put a cot. Look into clever storage solutions. It has a nice garden for a kid to run round in.
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • HJS86
    HJS86 Posts: 118 Forumite
    Geoffky that is really not helpful and very rude. If you had read the other posts, you would see that the flat was originally on for much more (over £100k) and we brought for 80k. It was almost a year before anyone else moved into the building, after which we found out that they had been purchased for £51k in bulk by a housing company. If this had occurred PRIOR to us purchasing ours of course we would not have purchased!

    The theory regarding the housing scheme is an interesting one, however not one that was ever put to us when we joined it else obviously we would have been cautious. At the time, during the inflated prices, it was the only choice we had and one that thousands of people have taken just to be able to step onto the first rung of the property ladder.

    I do not believe that the flat is only worth £51,000 at all. Even the lowest of our estate agents quotes were higher than this, with the average being at £65,000. Other flats in the area are around £60-80k - with one down the road, one bed just selling for £70,000.

    The flat will be taken off the market at the beginning of September and placed back on at a further reduced rate in February 2012, most likely for £72,500 if my mortgage calculations are correct. We are aware that this is still high, however cannot do anything else other than sit it out. Wont hurt it being on?

    We do not have any relatives to borrow money from so this is not an option for us as we may have looked into this.

    I appreciate all the comments regarding starting a family in the flat, however its just not even big enough to fit a cot in the bedroom realistically. In addition, we would like to start one in a couple of years so that gives us a little time. Hopefully by then, we'll have a nice lump sum to buy things such as a pushchair and cot. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and I really admire those who were able to make it work in a flat, however we really want to start our family in a house. Ask again in a few years time if were still in the flat and we may have changed our minds ;o)

    Thanks to those for the helpful comments :o) its what us members come on here for. Stark reality checks yes, but also for friendly advice and support and not to be told we are village idiots! Not helpful in these hard times when as a nation we should be supporting one another and keeping spirits up. Its what us British are good at isn't it? Keep Carm and Carry On!
    Saving like a looney for a juicy deposit and fees!
    Goal £8,000 by March 2012
    [STRIKE]Jun 2011 - £5095.50[/STRIKE]
    [STRIKE] Aug 2011 - £5995.78[/STRIKE]
    [STRIKE]Sep 2011 - £6209.76 [/STRIKE]
    Oct 2011 - £6409.76 :beer:
  • brit1234
    brit1234 Posts: 5,385 Forumite
    HJS86 wrote: »
    I do not believe that the flat is only worth £51,000 at all. Even the lowest of our estate agents quotes were higher than this, with the average being at £65,000. Other flats in the area are around £60-80k - with one down the road, one bed just selling for £70,000.

    The flat will be taken off the market at the beginning of September and placed back on at a further reduced rate in February 2012, most likely for £72,500 if my mortgage calculations are correct. We are aware that this is still high, however cannot do anything else other than sit it out. Wont hurt it being on?

    By this time house prices would of fallen further and you would get even less for it. Very risky strategy if you want to sell. Far better to do a big drop in September and pray.
    :exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.

    Save our Savers
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.