We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
XP slow
Comments
-
Thank you all so much.
Great info Bat999 and Anne-MArie. I am going to Crucial website to have a look at the RAM. I have a rough idea on how to fit it, I guess it's just knowing which slot it goes into but I will look for the instructions for it - thanks Anne-Marie.
SamTopCashback £1792.63My Little World0 -
Look at the link Norton does slow down your pc a lot its the 10th post (1dec)http://www.tiscali.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=116262
gary0 -
jasmin10 wrote:Thank you all so much.
Great info Bat999 and Anne-MArie. I am going to Crucial website to have a look at the RAM. I have a rough idea on how to fit it, I guess it's just knowing which slot it goes into but I will look for the instructions for it - thanks Anne-Marie.
Sam
Sam, I have upgraded many PCs from the year 2000 or so. XP is a lot more slower than ME. Memory is really the only thing you want to upgrade before buying a new base unit. It's not worth investing any more into that PC.
I will say that its likely that you will find that your existing memory will have to be taken out to put the new memory in as they will most likely use all the existing banks of memory.
More importantly, for memory for your machine it should be fairly cheap. You might want to consider upgrading the memory so that the amount in your machine site between 768Mb and 1Gb.
It depends a lot on what you do, but with a machine so old, you will find that if you have that little bit more memory, whilst it won't help you too much with loading applications etc, what it will do is that once everything is loaded up everything will run from fast memory and it will keep your PC running for a while longer.
It will also mean that you won't find performance degradation hitting you so hard when you happen to have one or more utilities loaded in the background like your virus checkers etc.
AMO0 -
I am going to get rid of Norton (*** another waste of money at least it was only £25), and go back to AVG and Zone Alarm.
I will see if this helps with starting up and applications.
Thanks for all your tips
SamTopCashback £1792.63My Little World0 -
yes i recommend getting rid of norton, its a drain on the memoryNo Links in Signature by site rules - MSE Forum Team 20
-
Right got rid of Norton and it is 100 x faster so thank you again. I am just about to download AVG but have a question about Zone Alarm. I didn't realise that XP had it's own firewall. Shall I use this or download Zone Alarn? I think that if the XP one is OK I may as well use it as it is already taking up space - what do you think?TopCashback £1792.63My Little World0
-
Yes, try AVG for certain.
Probably best/easiest to try Windows XP firewall first.Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.0 -
XP's built in one is crap
it will only block incoming attacks, a real firewall like Zonealarm will warn you if something is attempting to access the internet, once you have done the initial set-up of zonealarm if anything tries to access the net use google to find out what the file is....or come back here and askEx forum ambassador
Long term forum member0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards