We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tall Leylandi causes inspection issue on extension

2

Comments

  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    i took these out of the garden in the house i bought and was surprised how eassy it was the roots were not deep and not large. the plants were about 8 - 10 ft tall.

    couldn;t you dig down and concrete you boundary so the roots cant grow into your land?

    This plant is a lot taller. I can see the roots when the digger was digging the trenches for the foundation.

    I considered concreting the boundary, but my builder thought it a non starter.
  • i took these out of the garden in the house i bought and was surprised how eassy it was the roots were not deep and not large. the plants were about 8 - 10 ft tall.

    couldn;t you dig down and concrete you boundary so the roots cant grow into your land?

    Get rid of the arboreal abomination. If your neighbour just lets it have it's head it can reach 35 m and 8 m width . bloke next door to me has a line of them adjacent to his end fence and they block the sun out of his garden for half the day.
    You scullion! You rampallian! You fustilarian! I’ll tickle your catastrophe (Henry IV part 2)
  • davidjwest wrote: »
    Do you know where I can get some Triffids?

    :rotfl:

    http://www.triffidnurseries.co.uk/
    You scullion! You rampallian! You fustilarian! I’ll tickle your catastrophe (Henry IV part 2)
  • Foggster
    Foggster Posts: 1,023 Forumite
    We were very lucky when we rented a HA house and found a row of leylandi across the back of 10 houses because we complained (the other neighbours had resigned themselves to the fact they had to live with them) to the Council and they were removed under the Anti-social act!! Poor things were issued an ASBO!

    There is a calculation which can be used to work out if the tree is indeed being anti-social. I am sure a quick google should tell you.

    However, I would rather take the tea, chat and meeting half way on the cost.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    A brief update on this.

    When the building inspector came out, the builders asked him to clarify exactly what his original concern was (expressed as a 'manageable height' originally).

    His response was that we had 2 options :-
    a) the connifer is removed completely
    b) we have a concrete trench built to 2.2m depth

    Option b) is going to cost us way more than removal of the connifer tree (I had a tree surgeon come and give me a quote).

    I have to go back and speak with our neighbours and ideally push for a) and then we can fund a better replacement.

    What annoys me is the change in tone from the building inspector. I wish he had expressed the preference for removal or digging a trench when he first expressed the concern, and when the digger was here! It would have made life a lot easier ! :mad:
  • muppet83
    muppet83 Posts: 114 Forumite
    If the tree is over half its mature height - which for a Leylandi would be 10m - then according to the NHBC even if you remove the tree it will require the same depth of foundation as if the tree remained.
    If the tree is less than half height - so less than 10m high - then you can calculate the tree depths using the tables in NHBC chapter 4.2 based on actual tree height. But even if you completely remove the tree at less than half height it will still require the foundations to be deeper than a normal trench.
    BUt all this is based on it being a shrinkable clay - don't suppose you've had your soil tested?
    :EasterBun
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    muppet83 wrote: »
    If the tree is over half its mature height - which for a Leylandi would be 10m - then according to the NHBC even if you remove the tree it will require the same depth of foundation as if the tree remained.
    If the tree is less than half height - so less than 10m high - then you can calculate the tree depths using the tables in NHBC chapter 4.2 based on actual tree height. But even if you completely remove the tree at less than half height it will still require the foundations to be deeper than a normal trench.
    BUt all this is based on it being a shrinkable clay - don't suppose you've had your soil tested?
    Thanks for the reply :)

    No we haven't had the soil tested. It is clay based you are right.

    I will check the exact height of the tree.
  • danemi1
    danemi1 Posts: 1,353 Forumite
    how did you get on with this - we are having problems at the minute too - we may have to go down over 3 metres for the foundations which will cost thousands!
  • danemi1
    danemi1 Posts: 1,353 Forumite
    thanks for your reply hun - will let you know we get on x
  • 27col
    27col Posts: 6,554 Forumite
    The only way to approach a Leylandii is with a chain saw in your hand.
    I can afford anything that I want.
    Just so long as I don't want much.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.