Credit Card dispute - please help

chanz4

better not put them on a car, they may go through puddles.

meer53

YorkshireBoy wrote: »

Or 'misrepresentation', which sounds like it's the more relevant of the two?

But would section 75 apply? I mean, 4 wheels and p&p for £200...that's a little under £50 per item isn't it?

Good point on the Section 75 amount Yorkshireboy, you're probably right. Don't know whether they'd be classed as one item or not. Plus as the wheels weren't brand new, it's going to be very difficult to prove any sort of misrepresentation isn't it ? I get the impression that the OP is just expecting the credit card issuer to deal with this, i still think they've actioned a chargeback which has represented and are waiting for the OP to decide what he wants to do next, which is down to him. £150 sounds quite cheap to me for four alloy wheels, but then i am female so please excuse my stupidity if i'm wrong ! Does the fact that i'm a Yorkshiregal excuse me ?;)