We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can I exit my tenancy agreement? Various problems...
Comments
-
Gorgeous_George wrote: »Hi
The landlord has a responsibility to minimise your losses by getting new tenants as quickly as possible. If the agents/landlord are decent people they will do what they can to help.
That really is a strong statement, much stronger than the reality. It would be reasonable to say that a LL may have a duty to minimise the OPs loses but that case law, such as it stands (it is all from the world of commercial lets), suggests otherwise. For the latest example, see Reichman and Dunn v Beveridge and Gauntlett [2006].
At the risk of being accused of selective quotign, in this case the T's arguement was: "Mr Gauntlett urged on us a modern approach to the relationship between landlord and tenant, focussing on principles of contract law, and a policy approach which would not leave premises empty, after the tenants had abandoned them and while the landlord waited for the end of the lease, so as to avoid the waste of useful space and to ensure that property is put to beneficial use"
to which the court responded: "it seems to me that Mr Gauntlett's submissions fail to take account of the present state of English law as to the consequences of the premature termination of a tenancy"
Of course, if the LL agrees to seek new Ts at the current Ts expense then they should do so with reasonable effort. I would also agree that decent LL will not mess about with re-marketing the property, even where the T has not sought their agreement - but this does not appear to be a legal duty. For this reason, Ts should always ask their LL for early termination and should expect to negotiate the terms as this is not something that a LL has to do - so the T's terms should be generous enough to induce their LL to allow the early surrender.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards