We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
'The word pedants' top 10 | It's specific, not Pacific...' blog discussion.
Seems a lot of things irritate you. I'll just take this example. Strictly, it is indeed ungrammatical. But what's the alternative? There are two, neither satisfactory. (I've just made an error - can anyone spot it?)
EITHER "...at his own risk". Although it is conventional to use the masculine form to cover both genders (eg the word "man") it does imply in today's world that we've adopted Saudi driving rules.
OR "... at his or her own risk." This is pedantic and cumbersome. Don't like it.
So I would happily say "... at their own risk". It might not be strictly correct, but in my book it's good English.
I'm not familiar with Saudi driving laws, but "at his own risk" sounds more normal' "their own risk" just jumps out as being wrong. If I something jumps out in that way, it detracts attention from the rest of what is being said. I do agree that "his or her" is cumbersome and unnecessary.
I accept, as someone has pointed out that "you" was once plural/formal, but is now accepted as the singular form. I can see the same thing happening with "they/their". Language is not a constant.
