We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tile adhesive showing through
Options
Comments
-
petebates26 wrote: »It looks like the tiler has only dotted the tiles with adhesive - 4 spots in the corner of the tiles and one in the middle.Is this usually caused by the wrong tiles, the wrong adhesive, or the wrong method of application?Is there anything that can be done about this, or is it a case of either putting up with it, or removing them and starting again?Would you expect the tiler to bear responsibility (and therefore cost) of sorting it out?Thanks all
For a tile this size he should have used keraquick or keraflex cement based bagged addy (if sticking with Mapei). The tubbed stuff is not suitable IMO.
What is the weight per square meter of the tiles?
What is the substrate to which they have been affixed?
If the answer to the former is greater than 20kg per square metre (including the addy/grout @ approx 2.5kg/m2) which it will inevitably be with 10mm thick tiles and the answer to the latter is dry gypsum plaster or skimmed plasterboard then you have a problem and it will need redoing anyway when the tiles end up all over the floor.
CheersThe difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. - Einstein0 -
-
You can use floor tiles for the walls, that is not a problem. What is a problem if the tiles are 600x300mm, is the adhesive he used. He should have used a bagged adhesive. The adhesive he has used will not cure properly behind those tiles and is not designed for the weight either.
Tubbed adhesive requires air to circulate around it to cure properly and it would not be able to reach the middle of the tile. Bagged adhesive has both the strength to hold those tiles and cures by chemical reaction (once started it will set, even under water).
My last point is from a safety aspect. It's not bad enough that the wrong adhesive is used, if it is dot and dabbed, then there is a real danger that the tiles could fall off the wall.
I have a sneaking suspicion that the job was done by the cheapest bidder (and there is a reason they are cheap), or by someone who 'also does a bit of tiling' (because it's easy (( or is it????)) ).
Good luck sorting this out, but I can't see the original tiler fixing it or giving you a refund!
Beaten to it. I agree with Keystone.0 -
Thanks for all the answers folks - he's going to have a word with the tiler and see what sort of arrangement they can come to.
Another question - is it likely that the marks that can be seen through the tiles are stains, or just shadows? i.e. would it be possible to remove the tiles and reuse them again if the job was done again?
Cheers0 -
petebates26 wrote: »Another question - is it likely that the marks that can be seen through the tiles are stains, or just shadows?i.e. would it be possible to remove the tiles and reuse them again if the job was done again?
CheersThe difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. - Einstein0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards