We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

House prices by 2015

12345679»

Comments

  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think we've strayed quite some way from the actual point that was being talked about.

    Yes, of course it would be advantageous to borrow to buy in that case, as in many cases.

    But the point being made was, from a few pages back, where it seemed the answer to all current problems was more lending, allowing us to be wealthy again. I don't believe that is the case, believe we have enough problems as it is, hence the figures etc.

    Not sure what the argument is anymore though :p

    I was just responding to Jimmy’s post. I don’t think we should return to lax lending and there should in fact be some tightening up of credit card borrowing. But I don’t see a problem with lowering the deposit on houses to 10% and maybe 5% in certain situations as long as some form of affordability test is applied.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 April 2011 at 9:05PM
    I think we've strayed quite some way from the actual point that was being talked about.

    Yes, of course it would be advantageous to borrow to buy in that case, as in many cases.

    But the point being made was, from a few pages back, where it seemed the answer to all current problems was more lending, allowing us to be wealthy again. I don't believe that is the case, believe we have enough problems as it is, hence the figures etc.

    Not sure what the argument is anymore though :p

    It's apparent to me that some of the bears cannot distinguish between sensible borrowing and reckless borrowing which is probably why some of them cannot get their timing right for when to buy (and some never do, I think probably Carolt is a classic case of this)

    I see the term debt junky so often but really the term is often missused.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    It's obvoulsy better to be debt free but if you don't take on any you won't be able to buy the house will you.

    Lets take another example I believe Graham needs his car for work if his car engine blows up and he needs to borrow £1000 to repair it would it be better if he borrowed the money or lost his job.
    you have other factors too - if you save up to buy a house without a mortgage you stop yourself contributing for a pension for a very, very long time - which means you'll probably start paying into your pension when your over 50.

    fortunately your mortgage is inflation proof so buying without debt then becomes a double whammy of variables that will work against you.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    chucky wrote: »
    you have other factors too - if you save up to buy a house without a mortgage you stop yourself contributing for a pension for a very, very long time - which means you'll probably start paying into your pension when your over 50.

    fortunately your mortgage is inflation proof so buying without debt then becomes a double whammy of variables that will work against you.

    I personally don't pay into a private pension chucky, I have a minor DC one (only about 30k) that I started when I was about 20 but stopped soon after. Now that I am working part time in the public sector have the advantage of their final (probably soon to be 'average') salary scheme), that will probably only be worth about 9k a year.

    But as I will easily have enough income to live on I do not like the idea of losing control of money paid into pensions, however I respect your opinion and would be interested in any counter arguements you (or others) would put forward as it is dangerously arrogant to just assume you are totally correct and not listen to others.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 2 April 2011 at 11:13PM
    I personally don't pay into a private pension chucky, I have a minor DC one (only about 30k) that I started when I was about 20 but stopped soon after. Now that I am working part time in the public sector have the advantage of their final (probably soon to be 'average') salary scheme), that will probably only be worth about 9k a year.

    But as I will easily have enough income to live on I do not like the idea of losing control of money paid into pensions, however I respect your opinion and would be interested in any counter arguements you (or others) would put forward as it is dangerously arrogant to just assume you are totally correct and not listen to others.
    sorry, should have said that differently - i meant save for retirement instead of a pension.

    i've made plans for multiple streams of income for retirement instead of just depending on just my pension fund.
  • Poshbird
    Poshbird Posts: 222 Forumite
    gubdlog wrote: »
    Will house prices go up more than inflation the next few years?

    I think they will go up but not as much as real inflation.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.