We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Benefit Fraud interview with caution..help!
Options
Comments
-
Is it really appropriate for the site to offer help to someone called in for a caution interview? There are other ways to get advice professionally.
Dangerous for the original poster asking the Qs (bearing in mind the really dubious advice that has already been dished out) and also the chance that the poster may actually be guilty of something and the site then provides 101 excuses / ways to beat the system.:hello:0 -
-
Tiddlywinks wrote: »Why the interest? Do you have something to hide?
Data matching across govt depts is a good use of resources.
Did no-one else see the post the other night in which this Dogfish person admited to being the same person as Sardine/andy/goffo/cobble etc?
It was on a thread made by Viktory where Viktory was asking about a thread which had been deleted and she said she was going to bed so could someone update her the next morning.
It seemed to be on the site just minutes before it was removed....but it WAS there.
Dogfish is another of Andy's aliasesThe loopy one has gone :j0 -
Hello, know one knows me. If it brightens up your day to believe that them I'm glad to be of service. Certain people have got it in there heads that me and "Andy" are one and the same and no matter what I say they will continue to believe it. So I might as well go along with them. That's where you have been fooled.0
-
Tiddlywinks wrote: »Is it really appropriate for the site to offer help to someone called in for a caution interview? There are other ways to get advice professionally.
Dangerous for the original poster asking the Qs (bearing in mind the really dubious advice that has already been dished out) and also the chance that the poster may actually be guilty of something and the site then provides 101 excuses / ways to beat the system.no-oneknowsme wrote: »Dogfish is another of Andy's aliases*SIGH*0 -
MSE_Andrea wrote: »Hi everyone
We've just had to remove 72 completely off-topic posts from this thread (in addition to the ones removed at the weekend) so we could re-open it and let the OP get the help she needs. Please try to keep it on topic.
Thank you!
Andrea
4 people just ignored you and made off topic posts. Better luck next time. Maybe you guys just enjoy wasting hours editting topics instead of enforcing the rules harder. Either way its obvious from the fact you have been ignored how much respect there is on this forum for you, i honestly feel terrible for you.0 -
4 people just ignored you and made off topic posts. Better luck next time. Maybe you guys just enjoy wasting hours editting topics instead of enforcing the rules harder. Either way its obvious from the fact you have been ignored how much respect there is on this forum for you, i honestly feel terrible for you.
or is it okay for you.
*SIGH*0 -
I wonder how the OP Amanda got on with her IUC today?0
-
Well, I hope that Amanda walked out of the interview without a blemish on her character. And good luck for the future.0
-
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards