We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Are charges on a property part of standard searches?
evoke
Posts: 1,286 Forumite
Imagine this scenario. You buy a house and current vendors have a debt collection agency on their backs. You only find this out some time after completion. The house sale goes through fine and then the debt collection agency starts knocking on your door trying to contact the previous owners.
The previous owners have effectively done a runner. What would happen to you and your new home in this scenario?
Could it be possible that the debt collection agency is pursuing monies that were lent to the previous owners against a charge on the property? Or would charges against a property for debts show up as part of the standard conveyancing process?
Secondly, assuming that the previous onwers' debts were not secured against the property itself, could a debt collection agency then take stuff out of your new home or ask you for the money that was owed by the previous owners?
The previous owners have effectively done a runner. What would happen to you and your new home in this scenario?
Could it be possible that the debt collection agency is pursuing monies that were lent to the previous owners against a charge on the property? Or would charges against a property for debts show up as part of the standard conveyancing process?
Secondly, assuming that the previous onwers' debts were not secured against the property itself, could a debt collection agency then take stuff out of your new home or ask you for the money that was owed by the previous owners?
Everyone is entitled to my opinion!
0
Comments
-
Been there.
The answer is that financial records are not linked by address, so previous owners black marks don't become yours.
All charges on a property are cleared at the point of sale. Your solicitor ensures you have clear title to the property.
Debt collectors can only take property of the debtors.
The worst that should happen is post and knocks on the door from debt collectors. Once you show them some proof that you are not the debtor they seek, they should (and do, from my experience) politely take their leave.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
That's a relief. The seller did phone me a few days ago saying that I might get letters from debt collection agencies addressed to her maiden name and for me to just forward them on to her. I got a bit worried thinking my new home might be at risk!
I'm inclined to just return them to the sender marked as 'Not known at this address', if I do get any of the letters.Everyone is entitled to my opinion!0 -
I wouldn't return them 'Not Known' I would send them back 'No longer at this address' which is more factually correct.
In any event if the seller is asking for them to be sent on then I assume you have a forwarding address that can be passed on? Unlike our situation where we had no forwarding address and were getting letters on a daily basis from a variety of debt collectors.0 -
No, I don't have a forwarding address. Her parents live locally so she said they can collect any letters for her.
Interestingly, she has only set up Royal Mail redirection for one month. I'll do as you suggest: return to sender marked as 'no longer at this address'.Everyone is entitled to my opinion!0 -
I think charges secured on a house appear on the deeds. I have had a few 'final demands' from debt collection agencies for the previous owner of my house but just phoned the company and told them they no longer lived here and they were fine with this!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
