We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

My budget wish - less FSA regulation

145791013

Comments

  • julieq
    julieq Posts: 2,603 Forumite
    ILW wrote: »
    Ignoring the reasons, if housing costs were half what they are, would not the majority (among those that have to pay) have far better lives?

    And so what? If it rained jewels and precious metals from the sky we'd have better lives. It doesn't. We live in the times we live in and constrained by the situation we find ourselves in. Otherwise you're just locked into entitlement rhetoric.

    Housing costs are half what they are in South East in parts of the North West. Does that mean life in the North West is better? Well very possibly in some respects, but then again wages are lower too and there's arguably higher unemployment. Housing costs are much much lower in the slums of Delhi. Does that mean life is better?

    Situations change. If you don't build housing where people want to live, the price of the housing there is increases. That's the beginning and end of it.
  • julieq
    julieq Posts: 2,603 Forumite
    DervProf wrote: »
    Harsh.

    I think it's a decent analogy. Although irresponsible lending in the UK may not have caused the finincial crisis, the way some of our banks were lending did leave them exposed to the effects of a crisis. It's arguable that the banks that weren't offering so may high LTV products, and weren't aggresively lending such large amounts (thus relying on global financial markets) were not caught out as much as those that were.

    Ah OK, now it's explained it makes more sense.

    I think I said the same thing earlier anyway - Northern Rock was vulnerable to shocks because of the way it operated but hadn't anticipated the precise shock that happened. That doesn't mean that the entire lending industry was vulnerable in the same way. Most lending was well managed, but it was tarred with the same brush post crisis because no-one really knew the extent of the problems.

    Arguably the Tsunami was more predictible and that risk should have been mitigated incidentally, I think that will come out in the enquiry.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    julieq wrote: »
    And so what? If it rained jewels and precious metals from the sky we'd have better lives. It doesn't. We live in the times we live in and constrained by the situation we find ourselves in. Otherwise you're just locked into entitlement rhetoric.

    Housing costs are half what they are in South East in parts of the North West. Does that mean life in the North West is better? Well very possibly in some respects, but then again wages are lower too and there's arguably higher unemployment. Housing costs are much much lower in the slums of Delhi. Does that mean life is better?

    Situations change. If you don't build housing where people want to live, the price of the housing there is increases. That's the beginning and end of it.

    I am referiing to housings costs in general, not just house prices.

    My point was that if it at some point it was decided that lower housing costs are a good thing, then measures can be taken to lower them.
    General opinion seems to be that high costs are a good thing though, so measures seem to be taken to keep them high.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    julieq wrote: »
    Ah OK, now it's explained it makes more sense.

    I wonder if that makes sense to anyone else who agreed with your "Chewbacca" comment ?
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    julieq wrote: »
    And so what? If it rained jewels and precious metals from the sky we'd have better lives.

    I doubt we would. I think it would be worse.

    Quite painful/dangerous in a storm, I would have thought.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    julieq wrote: »
    Ooooo, so lax lending didn't cause the crisis. Therefore the lending was affordable.

    Erm no.

    Just because it didn't CAUSE the crisis, it doesn't mean it was all affordable.

    It's not a case that it's either "crisis" or "all fine and dandy". Theres a lot of middle ground between the two.

    Why we have to spend time explaining this kind of stuff I do not know. Maybe thats another thread.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    Erm no.

    Just because it didn't CAUSE the crisis, it doesn't mean it was all affordable.

    It's not a case that it's either "crisis" or "all fine and dandy". Theres a lot of middle ground between the two.

    Why we have to spend time explaining this kind of stuff I do not know. Maybe thats another thread.

    Lax lending did indirectly cause the crisis. Wasn't it American mortgage debt that was being "meddled with" that started it all off ?

    You can play with words all you like, but the root cause was debt.

    Our banks were exposed to this "funny money", and that's largely part of why our economy is where it is now.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • julieq
    julieq Posts: 2,603 Forumite
    Erm no.

    Just because it didn't CAUSE the crisis, it doesn't mean it was all affordable.

    It's not a case that it's either "crisis" or "all fine and dandy". Theres a lot of middle ground between the two.

    Why we have to spend time explaining this kind of stuff I do not know. Maybe thats another thread.

    Graham, you're the person making unsupported assertions. At some point it would be good if you provided some evidence, particularly since you're extremely dismissive of people who do actually have the first clue about what they're talking about.
  • julieq
    julieq Posts: 2,603 Forumite
    DervProf wrote: »
    I wonder if that makes sense to anyone else who agreed with your "Chewbacca" comment ?

    Part of the cut and thrust of debate really, don't get wound up about it.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    What is a Chewbacca comment?
    Isn't he some kind of monkey?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.