We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Developer paying stamp duty

2

Comments

  • SilverSix
    SilverSix Posts: 284 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    That's why I was a little taken back to find out that £260,000 included stamp duty!

    Such a ball ache don't see why they can't just do this a much simpler way!
  • JQ.
    JQ. Posts: 1,919 Forumite
    BennyC wrote: »
    That's why I was a little taken back to find out that £260,000 included stamp duty!

    Such a ball ache don't see why they can't just do this a much simpler way!

    Because they want the Land Registry to show you paid £260,000, so that when the developer sells their next house on the estate they'll tell the suckers that you paid £260,000. The potential buyers can then check this info on the internet and decide that the house is worth £260,000 because that's what you paid.

    They'll then get those buyers to pay £270,000 but offer to pay the stamp duty so they actually pay £260,000, the "real" value, demonstrated by your purchase. . . . . and on it goes up and up.
  • brit1234
    brit1234 Posts: 5,385 Forumite
    JQ. wrote: »
    Because they want the Land Registry to show you paid £260,000, so that when the developer sells their next house on the estate they'll tell the suckers that you paid £260,000. The potential buyers can then check this info on the internet and decide that the house is worth £260,000 because that's what you paid.

    They'll then get those buyers to pay £270,000 but offer to pay the stamp duty so they actually pay £260,000, the "real" value, demonstrated by your purchase. . . . . and on it goes up and up.

    Yeap I agree its the gift deposit land registry fraud all over again. Pay £250k or walk away.
    :exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.

    Save our Savers
  • SilverSix
    SilverSix Posts: 284 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    @JG: I see.
    brit1234 wrote: »
    Yeap I agree its the gift deposit land registry fraud all over again. Pay £250k or walk away.

    Is what they're doing actually fraud? I'll google this and mention it to my solictor. It's one the developer 'recommended/uses' I was going to ask them to clarify everything for me but I'll mention this too.
  • MegS
    MegS Posts: 234 Forumite
    I have one thing to say do NOT use the solicitor recommended/used by the developer, look for your own solicitor now before you get too far down the line.
  • Seconded;

    DO NOT use the developer's solicitor.
    Act in haste, repent at leisure.

    dunstonh wrote:
    Its a serious financial transaction and one of the biggest things you will ever buy. So, stop treating it like buying an ipod.
  • JQ.
    JQ. Posts: 1,919 Forumite
    BennyC wrote: »
    @JG: I see.



    Is what they're doing actually fraud? I'll google this and mention it to my solictor. It's one the developer 'recommended/uses' I was going to ask them to clarify everything for me but I'll mention this too.

    No it's not. It only becomes fraud if you don't tell your mortgage company about the incentive, and they therefore base their LTV on the £260,000 hypothetical purchase price and not the actual net purchase price of £250,000
  • Remember that most sensible mortgage lenders will consider the price for loan to value purposes to be £252,200 and they will only lend you their maximum percentage of that sum.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • SilverSix
    SilverSix Posts: 284 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    The amount I am borrowing is only half what they were willing to lend so there is room for movement here, however I am pretty sure my lender is aware of my incentives though I will double check this.

    Unfortunatley I had already started to use their solicitor so there isn't a great deal I can do about it now.

    I spoke to the solicitor who wasn't really able to clarify anything for me due to not knowing how the developer works. Though she did say I will pay the purchase price which is currently agreed at £260,000, why it's not been agreed at £252,200 is what I will be asking the developer when they open in 15 minutes. I expect them to tell me this is due to it affecting the average sale price of that particular build which is fair enough. However I will want it in writing that my stamp duty incentive is to be removed from the £260,000 'purchase' price.

    It seems to be that the contract as it stands won't be complete if the stamp duty is paid by the developer of £7800 and I only give £252,200 for the house when it has £260,000 on the contract.

    Erghh...
  • SilverSix
    SilverSix Posts: 284 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Right, well they probably couldn't make it any more confusing if they tried.

    Bottom line is as I thought, £260,000 to pay to my solicitor.

    Their 'net price' of '£251,200' is what it costs them not me (what they'll have left after my incentives have been deducted from it by them, not what I pay). I was right in thinking that stamp duty and £1k towards fees would be added on after if they weren't given to me as incentives.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.