We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

32% tax on savings interest?

....there is an article in today's Independent (can't do the link) which states the chancellor will announce in next weeks budget proposals to merge income tax & ni, giving an effective tax rate of 32% (ie basic tax rate 20% plus ni at 12%.) It states there will be winners & losers, it looks like us savers will be the losers.....:mad:
«134567

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,079 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Ni has effectively become a tax on those working. So, removal of it is a good idea.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • barak
    barak Posts: 1,258 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    At least the recent "Office of Tax Simplification" report states -
    "Obviously, the position of pensioners, who currently do not pay NICs will need to be considered thoroughly."

    http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/ots_small_business_interim_report.pdf
    ".....where it is corrupt, purge it....."
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,835 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    ed123 wrote: »
    ....there is an article in today's Independent (can't do the link) which states the chancellor will announce in next weeks budget proposals to merge income tax & ni, giving an effective tax rate of 32% (ie basic tax rate 20% plus ni at 12%.) It states there will be winners & losers, it looks like us savers will be the losers.....:mad:
    Another reason to get as much into ISAs as you can, even if you don't pay tax at present.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • ed123 wrote: »
    ....there is an article in today's Independent (can't do the link) which states the chancellor will announce in next weeks budget proposals to merge income tax & ni, giving an effective tax rate of 32% (ie basic tax rate 20% plus ni at 12%.) It states there will be winners & losers, it looks like us savers will be the losers.....:mad:

    If this happens then there is even more reason to get as much as possible within an ISA.

    However, they do not have to apply the same rate to savings and earnings. There is precedent for having different rates of tax on different types of earnings. The current system where two completely separate taxes (Income Tax and NI) are levied by the same body (HMRC) on earned income just seems barmy to me.

    So, if NI does get incorporated into income tax, would we be able to reclaim 32% tax on pension contributions, charity donations, union subs, professional fees, etc. I suspect not! We may end up with an even more complicated system than we suffer at present.

    David
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Why would anyone want to pay income tax on savings anyway?
    I have ISAs, NSI, pensions and an offset mortgage to avoid tax.
    Pretty much avoid it completely apart from a few pence on my current account.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,718 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    lisyloo wrote: »
    Why would anyone want to pay income tax on savings anyway?

    Nobody wants to but it isn't always possible to avoid it.
    I have ISAs, NSI, pensions

    So have I but still have investments/savings outwith even though I maximise my ISA limits each year.
    and an offset mortgage to avoid tax.

    I don't have a mortgage.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    This could be a real bombshell for the early retired.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • evenasus
    evenasus Posts: 11,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    lisyloo wrote: »
    Why would anyone want to pay income tax on savings anyway?

    I don't 'want' to but I have no choice.
    Both myself and my husband have saved the maximum each year in ISAs and before that TESSAs.
    But we have far more saved in other accounts, which we cannot avoid paying tax on.
    Our mortgage was paid off some years ago.
  • soulsaver
    soulsaver Posts: 6,708 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    StevieJ wrote: »
    This could be a real bombshell for the early retired.
    Yep - how does a 60% increase in tax paid sound?:mad:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.