We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Misleading or incomplete specs on shopping websites
Comments
-
Forwandert wrote: »If you were already aware certain things wouldn't work simultaniously why didn't you contact the company you purchased from before purchase for clarification? Doesn't sound like it was misadvertised just a lack of knowledge on your part as to the item purchased, if you needed it to do certain things always worth a little research rather then buying and hoping it will do what you require.A lot of people, me included, do this if its readily available online, especially if looking for some specific functionality.0
-
this sort of thing is best dealt with by your local Trading Standards as a product misdescription. I think the ASA are more interestied in dealing with more general misleading advertising.
the shop have probably just copied what the manufacturer gave them0 -
Who can you contact if you find that a product on a shopping website does not have complete spec or is misleading?
Forget about the rubbish suggestion to go to Trading Standards, unless they refuse your right to return the goods - then you can think about that!0 -
-
I can't believe there are so many naysayers in this thread. So far it seems I'm
- Unknowledgeable
- lazy and don't do enough research
- Wrong to criticize product labelling
Anyway, I didn't just get miffed about this slight technicality. Insuficient labeling is rife on and off the internet. For example, why is it so hard to find a SATA 3 and USB 3 and AM3 and integrated GPU motherboard. Drilling down should be much easier IMO.Then you wouldn't be having this problem in the first place, as you wouldn't have been able to buy it over the net.0 -
Money_User wrote: »It's not a misdescription!
How many people do you think work for Trading Standards? They'd hardly want to know about this!
an incorrect descrption or whatever you want to call it. its within the remot of TS not the ASA IMO.
whether they do anything about it or not is upto them but its always worth reporting, especially if its a common issue, at least they will then have the info to decide whether to do something about it or not.0 -
Brick and mortar shops have significantly less product information on display so I doubt that I would have realised this in shop if I went to buy from Maplin or yoyo.
But if you were in Maplin or Yoyo, you could have asked the advisor for an answer, and if they didn't know, they would be able to show you the manual!0 -
Anyway, I didn't just get miffed about this slight technicality. Insuficient labeling is rife on and off the internet.
In my opinion you should take some of the responsibility for not reading the manual (online version) or doing some research first, instead you just assumed you knew how it would work.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards