We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Please help - concerns about landlord..
pinkstarsx
Posts: 340 Forumite
Hello,
I hope someone can offer some advise!
I'm looking to move in to a flat at the beginning of April.
Have met the landlady and her parents who have been really helpful & i love the flat.
The landlady is looking to do the tenancy privately & not through an agent. At first i felt sceptical but then realised as long as the right contracts are drawn up it should be ok.
I looked at some other flats beforehand with an agent who said they had been trying to get this particular flat on their books but the landlady was reluctant to do so.
After having a discussion with her today, i mentioned i would prefer if she could sign up to a deposit scheme so when i pay a security deposit, we are both protected under certain acts as it's held in a fund, as she had said she wanted me to pay it to her then she puts it in a seperate account that doesn't get touched.
Obviously i was dubious as i cannot prove she won't touch that money.
She had mentioned before she had problems with her last tenant who didn't pay the rent and she lost out on a lot of money.
She became defensive & said that's probably not possible as it would affect her situation, that it could affect her mortgage and that other tenants would be happy to pay the deposit direct to her.
I'm now wondering whether she is registered as a landlord (does this have to be done?) and whether she has the correct mortgage to be able to let the premisis out? As it would make sense why she wants to go private and why she didn't claim any money back off the previous tenant.
Her situation is she moved away and now rents there so wants to cover the mortgage on this property.
I really do want to move into this flat but not sure if this is all legal?
Can anyone help
I hope someone can offer some advise!
I'm looking to move in to a flat at the beginning of April.
Have met the landlady and her parents who have been really helpful & i love the flat.
The landlady is looking to do the tenancy privately & not through an agent. At first i felt sceptical but then realised as long as the right contracts are drawn up it should be ok.
I looked at some other flats beforehand with an agent who said they had been trying to get this particular flat on their books but the landlady was reluctant to do so.
After having a discussion with her today, i mentioned i would prefer if she could sign up to a deposit scheme so when i pay a security deposit, we are both protected under certain acts as it's held in a fund, as she had said she wanted me to pay it to her then she puts it in a seperate account that doesn't get touched.
Obviously i was dubious as i cannot prove she won't touch that money.
She had mentioned before she had problems with her last tenant who didn't pay the rent and she lost out on a lot of money.
She became defensive & said that's probably not possible as it would affect her situation, that it could affect her mortgage and that other tenants would be happy to pay the deposit direct to her.
I'm now wondering whether she is registered as a landlord (does this have to be done?) and whether she has the correct mortgage to be able to let the premisis out? As it would make sense why she wants to go private and why she didn't claim any money back off the previous tenant.
Her situation is she moved away and now rents there so wants to cover the mortgage on this property.
I really do want to move into this flat but not sure if this is all legal?
Can anyone help
0
Comments
-
My advice is to run a mile. She is obviously up to no good. She probably hasn't told her mortgage company and isn't declaring the rental income to the taxman. Has she got landlord's insurance for the property.
Ask to see the gas safety certificate and ensure that any deposit is held under an approved scheme if you do want to proceed with the rental.Everyone is entitled to my opinion!0 -
I'm absolutely gutted, this place is perfect and you can tell she just genuinly wants to cover her mortgage payments.
But i need to be assured i'm covered should anything happen, which i wouldn't be if she isn't registered.
She used to live in the property for 4 years and has only recently moved out as took a job further away therefore now rents there. This is why i'm suspicious she hasn't followed correct procedures to enable her to let the flat out.0 -
Don't run a mile, run till you collapse!0
-
She *must* protect your deposit in an agreed scheme - she'll be breaking the law otherwise.0
-
My advice is to run a mile. She is obviously up to no good. She probably hasn't told her mortgage company and isn't declaring the rental income to the taxman. Has she got landlord's insurance for the property.
Ask to see the gas safety certificate and ensure that any deposit is held under an approved scheme if you do want to proceed with the rental.Don't run a mile, run till you collapse!
Woah! Woah!... Not so fast!!!
There is no "registration" of LLs in England.
She has a legal obligation to protect the tenancy deposit. That obligation can be invoked by the tenant at any time via the penalties contained within the legislation. HOWEVER, an unprotected deposit also means that a s21 cannot be used to evict. So, as long as the deposit isn't protected and the tenant doesn't transgress the S8 grounds, he/she cannot be evicted.
If you are happy that the LL is not at risk of repo, then go for it. YOU have nothing to lose. (But DO make sure the gas safety cert is in place).0 -
In the great scheme of things your LL has a lot more to lose than you do by not protecting your deposit as it's a statutory requirement.
If the LL hasn't gained her lender's permission to let your only risk is if she stops paying her mortgage. There's no indication yet that this will happen.
If she's not reporting the rental income to the Revenue that's a risk for her and not you.
If she doesn't have landlord's insurance you should take out your own contents insurance and cross your fingers that you don't burn the place down by putting a chip-pan on when you're !!!!ed.
Landlords in England and Wales do not have to be registered.
You need to make an informed choice about what the potential risks there are to you in this situation. I'm sure someone else will come on and point out something glaringly obvious which I have overlooked.0 -
The only other thing I'd worry about B&T would be the this LL is only renting out because she cannot sell. She's re-located for new job but what if new job doesn't go so well or she gets homesick. That fixed term of 6 or 12 months could be just that and no longer.Inside this body lays one of a skinny woman
but I can usually shut her up with chocolate!
When I thank a post in a thread I've not posted in,
it means that I agree with that post and have nothing further to add.
0 -
She is just trying to get out of paying landlord costs. Doesn't mean you are being scammed but it does mean that you don't have a leg to stand on if things go wrong. Really worth the risk??0
-
You are correct but sometimes a landlord's plans change and a tenancy would never be for longer than 6 or 12 months. Renting can always entail this risk.
In any case, as already mentioned, as long as the deposit is not properly protected and the OP continues to pay their rent no Section 21 would be valid. This could be a very convenient two-way street if the OP gets a signed receipt for their payment of the deposit0 -
1984ReturnsForReal. wrote: »She is just trying to get out of paying landlord costs. Doesn't mean you are being scammed but it does mean that you don't have a leg to stand on if things go wrong. Really worth the risk??
Which particular leg/s did you have in mind? Should the OP have a signed tenancy agreement and a proper inventory etcetera I can't see much of a problem bar the risk that the LL may fall behind with their mortgage payments. Should it come to repo time the OP will receive correspondence from the lender at which point they could stop paying the rent in order to recover their deposit.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards