We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Questions about Power of Attorney and moving into mother's house

13»

Comments

  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 36,294 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hi

    Pete has to understand that as an attorney, he cannot sell the house and split the proceeds three ways. It just is not allowed. Nor can he give your wife and the other brother one third of the value each and move in. As an attorney his sole function is to do the best for MIL, ignoring his own interests.

    Firstly, it is not in MILs best interests to divest herself of her assets. He can send cards and buy small presents for grand children, but all the other money(value of then house) has to be spent on MIL or Pete is actually defrauding MIL. Only when she dies can anyone have any of the assets. And in case he has any ideas, based on my own experience as an attorney, he cannot even try and find ways of reducing any IHT liability, as this is not in MIL's interests.

    If he does not understand this (and I think your wife needs to find a good solicitor to attend the meeting), Pete should not have POA.

    You may find Age Uk a good source of advice on this sort of theing.
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 260K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.