We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Child Benefit Frozen?

2»

Comments

  • loucroft
    loucroft Posts: 423 Forumite
    Nope, they aren't earnings - money you owned already that you don't 'earn' so no concerns in that respect

    L
    You can bury a lot of troubles digging in the dirt

    Author unknown
  • Hi,

    My wife's salary is just below the magic £42,375/annum BUT if she does overtime it pushes it over. We have kids aged 6, 4 and 10 months.


    I have three questions that I'm not sure about, i realise that fine details have not yet been published but do people have any suggestions.

    1. What tax year will the decision be based on? Is she going to have to keep below the high rate tax after April this year so as not to lose benefits in 2013, would there be a claw back if she went over it in 2013?

    2. I realise that the gross figure of £42,375/annum has been discussed, but as childcare vouchers and pensions are deducted before tax she is actually some way off paying higher rate tax at all! Does this mean benefits would not be effected?

    3. Any guesses how this would effect the longer term - i.e. lose benefit now and you'll have to re apply every year if situation changes?

    Any help appreciated
    Thanks
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 28 February 2011 at 12:15AM
    MR_BLAND wrote: »
    Hi,

    My wife's salary is just below the magic £42,375/annum BUT if she does overtime it pushes it over. We have kids aged 6, 4 and 10 months.


    I have three questions that I'm not sure about, i realise that fine details have not yet been published but do people have any suggestions.

    1. What tax year will the decision be based on? Is she going to have to keep below the high rate tax after April this year so as not to lose benefits in 2013, would there be a claw back if she went over it in 2013?

    2. I realise that the gross figure of £42,375/annum has been discussed, but as childcare vouchers and pensions are deducted before tax she is actually some way off paying higher rate tax at all! Does this mean benefits would not be effected?

    3. Any guesses how this would effect the longer term - i.e. lose benefit now and you'll have to re apply every year if situation changes?

    Any help appreciated
    Thanks

    From what I've heard the govt say it seems nobody will lose the right to claim CB, but they will somehow reclaim it through the tax system if you pay 40% tax. But there's no details yet - maybe they'll announce them in the budget in March. Till then it's all guesswork. But I would guess that any tax deductible stuff like pensions etc which take you below the 40% rate should mean you aren't affected.

    Personally I doubt it'll happen at all - or if it does it'll be watered down eg only apply if the individual claiming CB pays 40% tax (which would effectively mean where both parents pay 40%)
  • I thought there had been talk about the government looking at the figures again as the arguement had been put forward that it wasn't fair to stop CB in some higher tax payer circumstances - you could have two parents both earning in the higher rate tax bracket and another family where only one earner is working and earning in the higher tax bracket whilst other parent remains at home to look after the children........I'm sure I have read this somewhere?????
  • keith1950
    keith1950 Posts: 2,597 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 28 February 2011 at 6:58AM
    Yes ,but interest on savings is 'income' and is taken into account by the inland revenue for tax purposes and taken into account for most other benefits so why not in this case. If one partner gets over £42,375 in interest then they must have savings of well over £1,000,000 so shouldn't get any benefits but if any savings were split in different bank accounts so both partners had less than £4,2375 interest each they should be ok although any couple with savings of over £2,000,000 shouldn't really be getting child benefit. It's the same as the motability scheme, why should a millionaire get a free car just because they are disabled. The country is in such a mess that all benefits should now be means tested.
  • claim it back through the tax system?? a bit like how it used to be then; getting tax relief for children. then mrs thatcher changed it all.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.