We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The dreaded Council Tax
Comments
-
margaretclare wrote:I've only discovered quite recently that part of what we're paying for are the Regional Assemblies. ... I was made aware of this only this week by an article in our local paper, the Southend 'Evening Echo'. It seems we are now part of the East of England Region with a regional assembly at Cambridge, even though many of the local MPs, the Chairman of Essex County Council, and many others, are totally against the idea. And, importantly, this useless Assembly is taking up money which could be better spent.
I, apparently, live in the Arc Manche Transnational region - http://www.arcmanche.com/e_intro.htm
You live in Essex, so you are in the North Sea Transnational region - http://www.interregnorthsea.org/ for more details. Click around in there, on the map, etc., for more info.
EDIT. Trying to get at the information for all the UK is difficult but try http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/interreg3/abc/voletb_en.htm as your starter for 10.0 -
Mike_S wrote:Not only that, Margaret, you also live in one of the "super regions" - regions of regions - know as Transnational regions - another bright idea dreamt up in Brussels and which impose on us yet other unadvertised layer of expensive, unaccountable, unwanted and faceless bureaucrats.
Thank you for this, Mike. I clicked on the link you gave and I am appalled. Absolutely appalled. Never mind Scottish and Welsh devolution - the whole of the east side of the British Isles as far as the Orkneys and Shetlands to the north and the Thames estuary to the south, apparently becomes part of Denmark!
I have sent an email to the address given, info@interregnorthsea.org, as follows: "I am one of a growing number of people who does not want to live in a North Sea Region. I live in England, which is a nation with its own character, language and customs. I don't want my country to be split into regions and tacked onto part of the continent of Europe, from which we are separated by the English Channel and the North Sea.
Can you tell me at what stage the English people are to be consulted on
these changes, who has authorised them, who ever gave a mandate to your
authority to include us in this unwanted structure?
Would you please re-draw your map? England is bounded by the Scottish border to the north, the Welsh border to the west, and by the North Sea and the Channel coasts."
I should never have voted to 'stay in' the Common Market back in the 1970s, but then, who would have guessed that even if we voted to be part of an economic community for reasons of trade and prosperity, that our very existence as a country would be threatened?
And why are we never told about these things - how can we be said to live in a 'democracy'?
I can only think that the only way forward is to support any of the alternative political parties who state unequivocally on their manifesto - withdraw from Europe. These changes have crept up on us without our knowledge and consent. I think that we should make as many people as possible aware, because I'm certain that few are aware at present, although obviously many are concerned about 'the dreaded council tax' - now you know why it's 'dreaded'.
Margaret[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
Before I found wisdom, I became old.0 -
seven-day-weekend wrote:Are these people all members of the isitfair protest group?:
Why not have a look at : http://www.isitfair.co.uk/publicforum2/index.php0 -
These "regions" would appear to be a new wheeze dreamed up by some bright spark to extract money from Brussels.
Got an idea, submit it here
Since they've been around for about 10 years and nobody has ever heard of them, I think we can safely say that they're not much of a threat.Trying to keep it simple...0 -
I too am a member of the Isitfair Campaign. This wretched tax not only affects the pensioner but anyone on low earnings or fixed incomes. What about the young attempting to get on to the property ladder? £30 per week is just like another Mortgage. Unaffordable and unacceptable. Council Tax has to go.0
-
But what you replace it with? Whatever scheme is dreamt up for any form of taxation, it will always be unfair to some (if not most) of the population.0
-
ManAtHome wrote:But what you replace it with? Whatever scheme is dreamt up for any form of taxation, it will always be unfair to some (if not most) of the population.
Council Tax only provides 25% of local funding, the other 75% comes from Central Government via the Inland Revenue anyway, so why not the rest of it? Why do we need to fund some 500 seperate local tax collecting departments right round the country when it can all be done automatically by the Inland Revenue with a couple of pence (or whatever) increase in the basic rate of Income Tax. This would not only be much cheaper by cutting out unneccessary duplication by each and every council, it would also be immeasurably fairer to all since it takes proper account of 'ability to pay', i.e. your disposable income having regard to your committments, and no, unlike seven-day-weekend, I don't believe that someone whose income is too small to pay any Income Tax should be forced to pay a third (or indeed any) of his meagre income in Council Tax.0 -
Lodestoneman, this average figure of 25 percent paid by the council tax payer really needs some explaining. Many of the tax payers in the Shire counties are contributing much more than 25% in fact. That figure rises to well over 40% and falls to well under 15% in some Metropolitan and Unitary authorities. The average council tax in say Surrey is over £1,400 and in Manchester about £700. This difference is caused by the nationwide banding system based on the value of property. We must remember that there are many rich people living in the North and many poor people living in the South. So as long as Local Authorities are kept afloat by a property tax it cannot be fair.
See the Isitfair document offering solutions, fairer solutions, on the website https://www.isitfair.co.uk.0 -
lodestoneman wrote:seven-day-weekend, I don't believe that someone whose income is too small to pay any Income Tax should be forced to pay a third (or indeed any) of his meagre income in Council Tax.
I didn't say someone who didn't pay income tax should pay a third of their income in CT, I said they should pay SOMETHING.
Oh well, works out better for me, a non-income tax payer.:T(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
And why should I, as a single taxpayer, pay more for using fewer services?
From my point of view, either property tax or pay-for-what-you-use would be fair... as it would mean I'd pay less.
And as for "ability to pay" being fair - see some of the other threads about benefits v savings as whether all think this is fair.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards