We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Just Peugeot Citroen Ltd
Comments
-
Strider590 wrote: »Contact Peugeot/Citroen/Talbot (the car manufacturer) and tell them all about this company....... They'll sue them for every penny they've got.
I will assume this is a joke.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
Norman_Castle wrote: »Have you asked them for a refund?
yes, several times0 -
-
yes, I've seen the reviews. Trading standards said they need people to make their individual complaints as website reviews don't count. So if you have had bad experience, report to trading standards. The more they get, the more action they can take.0
-
They are on dodgy ground trading as "Just Peugeot Citroen Ltd" as the name infringes trademark and could confuse people into thinking the company is partnered with Peugeot or Citroen. I can see them sending legal letters to force them to name change and maybe going to court if they refuse.I will assume this is a joke.0 -
If you've voluntarily bought a Peugeot or a Citroen, then I imagine dodgy parts suppliers are the least of your problems.0
-
They are on dodgy ground trading as "Just Peugeot Citroen Ltd" as the name infringes trademark and could confuse people into thinking the company is partnered with Peugeot or Citroen. I can see them sending legal letters to force them to name change and maybe going to court if they refuse.
But, seeing as they are no longer called Peugeot, Citroen and Talbot (as originally implied by Strider) and this is a service issue, I doubt very much PSA would sue on the basis of the parts supplier's poor service, or that they would have a viable case at all.
That said the full trading name of the company is "Just Peugeot Citroen Parts Ltd," quite unambiguous and pretty clear by the name, that they sell just Citroen and Peugeot parts. It could be argued that the "only" also refers to parts. Thus, it sells parts only and cars. The company have been incorporated since two thousand and nine, plenty of time for PPSA to have objected. Companies House would also have advised them to think again, if they thought the name infringed on that of another company.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
I don't think Strider was suggesting Peugeot/Citroen would sue the company for offering bad service. I think he was suggesting the OP contacts Peugeot/Citroen to inform them of the presumably unauthorised use of their trademark in the company name so that the company could take legal action. A lot of companies take trademark protection very seriously and this a straightforward case - most likely Peugeot/Citroen don't know this relatively new and small company exists yet.
You say Companies House would have advised them to think again but I don't think that's their responsibility - its down to the person forming a new company to check he doesn't infringe himself.
"Just Peugeot Citroen Parts Ltd" could easily lead to someone thinking it was officially linked to Peugeot or Citroen's operations - maybe an official division or authorised supplier supplying parts etc. There's no way you can get away with that kind of name without permission. Companies have been forced to change names over a heck of a lot less.0 -
I don't think Strider was suggesting Peugeot/Citroen would sue the company for offering bad service. I think he was suggesting the OP contacts Peugeot/Citroen to inform them of the presumably unauthorised use of their trademark in the company name so that the company could take legal action. A lot of companies take trademark protection very seriously and this a straightforward case - most likely Peugeot/Citroen don't know this relatively new and small company exists yet.
But there is nothing to sue over. The name of the company explains exactly what it does (trying to resist references to the outside of "tins"
). They sell just Peugeot and Citroen parts and I presume little else. I am sure they sell Toyota and Fiat parts as well, but there is little point in putting that down on the companies house form. There are loads of companies out there taht have names of motor manufacturers in theor names, I can't see them suing all of those, can you. Near to us we have a law firm called Ford and Brothers, I don't see Ford Motor Company bothering with that.You say Companies House would have advised them to think again but I don't think that's their responsibility - its down to the person forming a new company to check he doesn't infringe himself.
That is exactly Companies House's jobThe greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
Companies sue others if there's even a hint of trademark violation, have a look at the McDonalds trademark cases! McCoffee and McMunchies both stopped from using the name just because of the "Mc" in front!But there is nothing to sue over. The name of the company explains exactly what it does
By your logic I can register "Not McDonalds But A Better Burger Bar" and be okay... I wouldn't last 2 minutes
The whole point of registering trademarks and protecting business names etc is to stop other people in a similar field from using them! Peugeot / Citroen are in the motor business so they're absolutely entitled to stop someone else using the "Citroen" or "Peugeot" name from selling car parts - they would be successful 100%!
Well, I've just been to their website, and it says in the FAQ that its your responsibility to search the IPO website yourself and you must ensure your name doesn't interfere with anothers trademark.That is exactly Companies House's job
I can see nothing about them doing a search to make sure for you.
When I registered as self employed, they didn't check if my trading name was going to infringe any trademarks.
It's not even possible to know for sure before you register a company whether your going to be infringing a trademark or not, so responsibility must be on the one who is registering the company name.
Where's your evidence that Companies House are responsible for advising you if your name will infringe copyright/trademark? How do you know they did not do this but the owner decided to register "Just Peugeot / Citroen Car Parts" anyway.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards