We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Special Conditions - Legally Binding?

2

Comments

  • Errata
    Errata Posts: 38,230 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Or to put it another way, the property wasn't surveyed, it was valued.
    .................:)....I'm smiling because I have no idea what's going on ...:)
  • Doozergirl wrote: »
    It is always 'caveat emptor' - meaning buyer beware. It is always, always, always the buyer's responsibility to check that everything they want to be in good order, is as such. In order to tdo that, they would need to commission their own survey - either a homebuyers report or a full buildings survey.

    From what I've read, if the purchaser can prove that he was fraudently or negligently misled, either verbally or in writing, and he's prepared to pursue the case, caveat emptor goes out of the window. In addition, there has been at least one case where a purchaser has successfully sued a building society valuer.

    Once you start delving, it's a bit more of a minefield than commonly believed.
  • evoke
    evoke Posts: 1,286 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    So your purchaser can prove that you told him the roof is perfect and will not start leaking shortly after he moves into the property? No, I don't think so either. Relax. Your purchaser sounds like tw*t.
    Everyone is entitled to my opinion!
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    The purchaser was not knowingly misled. They appear to have stated no grounds for their complaint. The OP should not say anything at all apart from "prove it or shove off".
  • I am struggling to imagine what OP might have said that could help the buyers.

    If you had a problem with the roof before and told the buyers you hadn't had a problem then they might begin....and they would have the hurdle of the special conditions and proving a deliberate intention to mislead etc....

    If you hadn't had a problem and simply said that you are not making a representation about the future so I can't see where that would get them.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • bris
    bris Posts: 10,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    dorsoduro wrote: »
    From what I've read, if the purchaser can prove that he was fraudently or negligently misled, either verbally or in writing, and he's prepared to pursue the case, caveat emptor goes out of the window. In addition, there has been at least one case where a purchaser has successfully sued a building society valuer.

    Once you start delving, it's a bit more of a minefield than commonly believed.
    This is correct, you can't say something is good if you know it's not. On the other hand if you said something was good to the best of your knowledge at that time, then under extreme circumstances such as the wild weather in December it turns bad this is outside your control and you have not deliberatly mislead the buyer.
    Thousands of roofs, including mine failed under the stress of the December weather, no one can account for that.
  • I am struggling to imagine what OP might have said that could help the buyers.

    Absolutely nothing, as not once during his seven visits to the property did he ask anything whatsoever about the roof (or anything else about the fabric of the house for that matter).

    However, as his solicitor's letter contained seven inaccuracies (I've being very careful with the wording there!), he appears to have some difficulty separating fact from fiction.
  • goRt
    goRt Posts: 292 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    The clause you're referring to is known as 'the entire agreement clause' - very common in contract law
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    dorsoduro wrote: »
    From what I've read, if the purchaser can prove that he was fraudently or negligently misled, either verbally or in writing, and he's prepared to pursue the case, caveat emptor goes out of the window. In addition, there has been at least one case where a purchaser has successfully sued a building society valuer.

    Once you start delving, it's a bit more of a minefield than commonly believed.

    They are just trying it on, you have nothing to worry about. Your solicitor should have just sent them a prove it or go away letter by now.
  • They are just trying it on, you have nothing to worry about. Your solicitor should have just sent them a prove it or go away letter by now.

    I agree. The buyer's solicitor probably wanted to shut his client up so agreed to write the letter for a £50-£100 fee to get the buyer out of the office and is waiting for OP's solicitor to write back the "prove it or go away" letter so he can tell his buyer client: "I told you so".
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.