We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Attention Savers.,...

2

Comments

  • DervProf wrote: »
    Hamish, you are implying .

    I'm implying nothing.

    I'm asking a simple question, that you have not answered.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,227 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I obviously have to look back and question my beliefs if I find myself agreeing with Hamish but I was thinking of posting along similar lines about how the Govt should stop bailing out the savers.

    <rant>Savers do not seem to realise that their savings are someone else's borrowings and if the banks had not been bailed out then it is the savers who would have lost out - even for sums below the old 35k limit would only have been as safe as the eventual guarantor, the Govt - and we saw what happened in Iceland when a govt tried to backstop bank liabilities many times the value of GDP.

    So whining savers, each time you protest about the govt bailing out imprudent borrowers and banks just remember who's money it was at the end of the day that was protected.(/rant>

    Sadly no one (except Hamish who doesn't really count) will get it :(
    I think....
  • So you advocate the chav life ? spend spend spend and let the government bail you out when your old, don't save for old age, get it down yer neck lad and stuff the world, they owe you a living and will look after you

    ummm interesting, and if savers do as you say, i.e. don't bother saving it ain't worth it, what state will the country be in, we are already creaking, but a few more million living off the backs of the few who work and save? .....last one out switch the lights out please, just off to the Aston dealers with my savings!
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,227 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If I implied any moral judgement in my post it was unintentional.
    I think....
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    I'm implying nothing.

    I'm asking a simple question, that you have not answered.

    OK, I don't personally know any low risk entities, business or individuals, for whom it would make commercial or financial sense to borrow your money at those prices. However, I am sure that borrowing money @ 7-9% is hardly loan shark territory. In fact, I do know someone who took out a car loan about 12 months ago at 7%.

    If you would like that answer on a postcard, please let me know your address. I don't think Mr McTavish, Somewhere in Aberdeen would be precise enough.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • bendix
    bendix Posts: 5,499 Forumite
    When inflation (and wage inflation) was generally in double digits, for the decades you'r referring to anyway.




    Nor is the interest rate environment from the 60's to 90's. That was the highest rates in the 300 years of interest rate history, and equally abnormal.

    Those decades are the only decades worth discussing in this context because they coincide with the first time in history of most ordinary working and middle class people owning their homes.

    Whether you like it or not, the normal mortgage rate for most people who have had home loans over the last 40 years or so has been around 7-10%.
  • bendix
    bendix Posts: 5,499 Forumite
    No, I'm asking who you think is a safe risk to lend money to at 9% today.


    ....

    The average household debt (excluding mortgages but including unsecured loans) in the UK is currently around £18-19k. It was precisely £18,324 in May 2010, so I think it's safe to assume that range remains accurate.

    Given the bulk of that debt will comprise credit cards, retail finance and retail store debt, I think we can safely say that those people will be paying interest rates considerably higher than 8-9%

    More like 15-18% in fact.

    So there's your answer.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    So when you expect 5%, 6%, 7% returns on savings, you are expecting borrowers to borrow your money at 7%, 8%, 9%, etc....

    Blimey Hamish, you are getting desperate.

    Please don't let the elephant in the room get in your way.

    The elephant is quietly tapping on your shoulder, and asking you how you can come up with such rubbish, considering only 4 years ago, you could borrow money from banks, for instance, Alliance & Leicester at 6.9%, and as a saver, you could get 6%.

    How long can you ignore the elephant and simply make up your own scenarios to suit before the tapping on your shoulder has you annoyed and simply getting up and leaving the discussion?

    BTW, try to find me a decent personal loan rate of below 7% at the moment.
  • Blimey Hamish, you are getting desperate.

    Please don't let the elephant in the room get in your way.

    The elephant is quietly tapping on your shoulder, and asking you how you can come up with such rubbish, considering only 4 years ago, you could borrow money from banks, for instance, Alliance & Leicester at 6.9%, and as a saver, you could get 6%.

    How long can you ignore the elephant and simply make up your own scenarios to suit before the tapping on your shoulder has you annoyed and simply getting up and leaving the discussion?

    BTW, try to find me a decent personal loan rate of below 7% at the moment.

    Psst....I will do you 6.5% for monthly cash payments :rotfl:
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    Plenty of answers being forwarded.

    Hamish, your postman is going to have a very full sack for you.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.