We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Urgent: Buy to Let insurance
schander
Posts: 40 Forumite
Hi all,
Not sure if this is the right place for this, or if it should be in the insurance forum.
Anyway i have just exchanged on a buy-to-let and my solicitor has just informed me that I am responsible for the insurnace on the house now. So should i take out buildings and contents or just buildings??
I'm new to all this. Yes I know i should have done more research before buying but things got hurried along a little as the seller was desperate to sell, to the quickest buyer.
Thanks
satpal
Not sure if this is the right place for this, or if it should be in the insurance forum.
Anyway i have just exchanged on a buy-to-let and my solicitor has just informed me that I am responsible for the insurnace on the house now. So should i take out buildings and contents or just buildings??
I'm new to all this. Yes I know i should have done more research before buying but things got hurried along a little as the seller was desperate to sell, to the quickest buyer.
Thanks
satpal
0
Comments
-
If you bought with a mortgage then your solicitor shouldn't have exchanged without insurance being in place !
If it burns down tonight who will pay ? I bet the solicitor wont be offering.
You are badly exposed and should get something sorted ASAP.0 -
alan boswell insurance brokers - 01603 2180000
-
You will only need contents insurance, if you have some contents!0
-
If you didn't realise you had to insure your property, you may find the following useful. It's what I usually post when someone asks about starting a property rental business.
Starting a property rental business is like starting up any other business. You need a business plan.
Do void periods, bad debts, repairs, redecoration, legal fees,insurance, agents fees, costs of evicting bad tenants, rises in interest rates to, say, 8% and possible falls in property values figure in your business plan?
Are you familiar with the 50 Acts of Parliament and 70 sets of regulations which may apply? Did you know you can be held responsible for the anti-social behaviour of your tenants?
Then you need to look at the taxation side. Any profit you make will be taxed at your highest rate of income tax and if you make a profit when you sell you will have to pay Capital Gains Tax. though there may be reliefs.0 -
sanfrancisco wrote:You will only need contents insurance, if you have some contents!
I would have thoguht that I needed only buildings as there should be not contents??
I think i will sort out buildings and contents, then i can always cancel contents if i dont need it.
Thanks
Satpal0 -
Even if you let unfurnished you will still have contents - landlords policies include white goods and some stuff like carpets, blinds etc - talk to a good broker - they are the ones that know about the intricate details of the policy. ask about liability also. Tenants need to insure their own belongings
please dont take this the wrong way but it sounds like you need to do an enormous amount of reading before you go any further - where are you going to get your AST from from example ? i strongly strongly suggest you join the National Landlords ASsociation; and that you use a letting agent for the first six months to see how things are done.0 -
check the finite policy wording, some exclude tenants having people in the house, ie only cover when named tenants in... fire if having people to stay = not covered, some wont cover you if house empty for little as 5 days...try asking tenants what they're going to do...no chance,
theres a lot of odd policy exclusions, PM me if you want to know who we use0 -
A_Nice_Englishman wrote:If you didn't realise you had to insure your property, you may find the following useful. It's what I usually post when someone asks about starting a property rental business.
Starting a property rental business is like starting up any other business. You need a business plan.
Do void periods, bad debts, repairs, redecoration, legal fees,insurance, agents fees, costs of evicting bad tenants, rises in interest rates to, say, 8% and possible falls in property values figure in your business plan?
Are you familiar with the 50 Acts of Parliament and 70 sets of regulations which may apply? Did you know you can be held responsible for the anti-social behaviour of your tenants?
Then you need to look at the taxation side. Any profit you make will be taxed at your highest rate of income tax and if you make a profit when you sell you will have to pay Capital Gains Tax. though there may be reliefs.
lol have you kept a tally of the number of times you feel the need to post this. Scary.0 -
Sisyphus wrote:lol have you kept a tally of the number of times you feel the need to post this. Scary.
The scary thing is the number of people investing hundreds of thousands in a business without doing any research or having a clue what they are doing.My policies are based not on some economics theory, but on things I and millions like me were brought up with: an honest day's work for an honest day's pay; live within your means; put by a nest egg for a rainy day; pay your bills on time; support the police - Margaret Thatcher.0 -
Sisyphus wrote:lol have you kept a tally of the number of times you feel the need to post this. Scary.whambamboo wrote:The scary thing is the number of people investing hundreds of thousands in a business without doing any research or having a clue what they are doing.
Sorry if I'm boring people but I hope that if just one or two take notice they will be saved from a possible business failure and their tenants will be saved from having an 'amateur' landlord who doesn't understand his/her responsibilities.
Funnily enough, nobody has yet come back and said 'yep, I've looked into that and decided property rental is the business for me'
My own experience is that I rented out my house when I moved to a different part of the country to work. Even owning the property outright I found I would do better keeping the money in the bank so I've sold up. I could have held out for a rise in property prices but personally I doubt that will happen in the short term.
Those professional landlords who are in property rental for the long term and bought some time ago will no doubt have a different view.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards