PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Accelerated repossession

Options
I have been served with an A R order from the court to which I am replying. I had not received the S 21 . However the Letting agents/Landlord have started a seperate action for non-payment of rent in the small claims court. I have read that with an A R order they cannot claim outstanding monies just the repossession of the property.

Is it therefore legal for them to start a seperate claim when clearly a "standard " repossession order is available to reclaim the property and all outstanding monies.

Does anyone know what law covers A R and is it invalid if a parallel case is taking place. Thanks

Comments

  • N79
    N79 Posts: 2,615 Forumite
    It is perfectly legal. In fact, a LL could even use the "standard repossession" order (as you call) based on a Section 8 notice for non payment of rent and still launch a separate action for the outstanding rent (although obviously they can not claim the outstanding rent twice).

    Clearly you owe rent and the LL wants possession of the property back. They are using the non fault route for possession and the small claims court for the outstanding rent - a perfectly reasonable approach.

    Clearly you feel you have a defence to the possession order based on faulty service of notices. You have no point or defence regarding the LL simultaneously suing you for the outstanding rent.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.