We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What % Mortgage to Income
Options
Comments
-
I'm currently paying 19% of my take home on mortgage and 3% on service charges etc. I will be overpaying as soon as I've built my savings back up to the desired level.Happy chappy0
-
I currently pay around 20%. I could go to 60% but there would be nothing in reserve.
In the early 90's, before the crash, 45% was common and caused a lot of people trouble. So I agree that in general 33% should be the norm.
Regards
XXbigman's guide to a happy life.
Eat properly
Sleep properly
Save some money0 -
currently paying 14.31% of joint income.
my new house and mortgage will be 29% of our joint income0 -
Excuse me being an ignoramus but are we talking about gross or net wages?Don't judge people on they way they look, the way they speak or what they're called because they can't help that.
Only judge people on what they say and what they do.0 -
Don't know; I used mortgage payment over net monthly income (excluding money courtesy of gambling loophole exploitation)Happy chappy0
-
We're going from 30% to 41%. I must admit that short term we're putting the money we currently put into savings towards a mortgage.
We became very frugal when I left my job 18 months ago and managed 'old style' for a few months so we know we can tighten our belts again if necessary and we have a savings cushion.Stercus accidit0 -
Before we moved earlier this year our mortgage was approx 10% of our joint take home pay. When we moved, it jumped up to 23%.0
-
Presumably the % "ought" to be lower for couples vs single people anyway, (and lower again if there are kids), as anything left over is then used for bills and living costs for x many people.0
-
BrunoM wrote:Presumably the % "ought" to be lower for couples vs single people anyway, (and lower again if there are kids), as anything left over is then used for bills and living costs for x many people.
I disagree to a certain extent. As a couple your bills are not double what a single person has so you have more disposable income , so therefore a higher percentage is eaiser as you are sharing many things. This is if you are both working and decent wages - If only one is , or the second income is very low then I agree and obviously yes the % needs to be lower.0 -
OK - the % can be higher the higher total income is, and the % can be lower the more people are involved for bills and living expenses. Both statements are true and independent of each other!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards