Charities board update
Please note, our Forum rules no longer allow the posting of links to personal fundraising or crowdfunding pages, such as JustGiving. You can read the full set of our Forum rules here.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Intelligent Giving

Options
I have just stumbled across a new website that adopts a whole new approach to giving to charity. It is fun, informative, and not afraid to ruffle some feathers.

It looks critically at the way charities are run and gives them ratings. I have never seen this done before and it is so refreshing. My one concern is that it does not look at the work the charity actually does.

I recommend checking it out - http://www.intelligentgiving.com

Neldo

Comments

  • Thanks Neldo. Thanks for the 'fun' you mention. We had a fun (but not easy) time bringing the site together over a year and a half, and I think it shows, not least in areas like our 'Karma Calculator' and Alain de B'Argain's column (he's real, really).

    We would love to have looked at the work the charities do but it's basically too much work for three people on a very tight budget.

    Instead we have judged the transparency of 500+ charities. This indication of their a, professionalism and b, honesty, is more useful and comparable than the marketing guff that comes your letterbox.
  • GiveItBack
    GiveItBack Posts: 1,484 Forumite
    Dave,

    Suggestion on your site about the layout of posts. I like this one much better.
    Regards
    GiB
    for more info check out www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk . You'll find me there.
    New Year's Resolution: Post less unnecessary posts. (and that was 2007)

    yes, I realise I may appear cold and heartless a lot of the time.
  • Observer article on some charities and their admin costs

    The way in is the misleading way that Children in Need advertises to make some people think that it doesn't have admin costs when in fact it does (paid for from the income from investment revenue built up by public donations).

    And since it is primarily a conduit to channel money to other charities there are clearly admin costs further down the line.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.