We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Rules when visiting the Job Centre
SMC_2
Posts: 780 Forumite
I have health issues and have had to claim benefits as a result. Anytime I have had to go to the Job Centre I have taken someone with me and it has been no problem.
A relative of mine has had to start claiming JSA as they are out of work and they went along for first appointment earlier in the week and had to go back today. Today they took someone with them and they were told that for today they'd let the other person be with them but in future they were to come on their own.
Is this a rule just for JSA claimaints or does it apply to all claimaints no matter what benefit they are claiming?
Thanks in advance!
A relative of mine has had to start claiming JSA as they are out of work and they went along for first appointment earlier in the week and had to go back today. Today they took someone with them and they were told that for today they'd let the other person be with them but in future they were to come on their own.
Is this a rule just for JSA claimaints or does it apply to all claimaints no matter what benefit they are claiming?
Thanks in advance!
0
Comments
-
It is recognised that those claiming ESA/ IB may need somebody to support them. However if you are fit for work there is really no need to have someone accompany you to the JCP. There is no overall rule that a person cannot be accompanied, but equally an advisor can stipulate that they will only see the claimant.Gone ... or have I?0
-
If there wasn't any rule against it then it shouldn't matter what the advisor thinks.0
-
There are rules about this. The Job Centre isn't a social venue. The bottom line is that people won't be allowed to bring their mates in with them because the offices are crowded enough already, without hangers on talking, chatting on mobile phones, placating screaming kids etc etc.
Exception being those who need someone to support them due to ill health, as DMG24 says.I no longer contribute to the Benefits & Tax Credits forum.0 -
It is recognised that those claiming ESA/ IB may need somebody to support them. However if you are fit for work there is really no need to have someone accompany you to the JCP. There is no overall rule that a person cannot be accompanied, but equally an advisor can stipulate that they will only see the claimant.
I thought that would be the case but wanted to see what others thought.There are rules about this. The Job Centre isn't a social venue. The bottom line is that people won't be allowed to bring their mates in with them because the offices are crowded enough already, without hangers on talking, chatting on mobile phones, placating screaming kids etc etc.
Exception being those who need someone to support them due to ill health, as DMG24 says.
It wasn't a case of taking a mate, it was a relative who was with them.0 -
There are rules about this. The Job Centre isn't a social venue. The bottom line is that people won't be allowed to bring their mates in with them because the offices are crowded enough already, without hangers on talking, chatting on mobile phones, placating screaming kids etc etc.
Exception being those who need someone to support them due to ill health, as DMG24 says.
What about in reverse, i.e someone is called for an interview, and that person normally looks after their partner?
Can the partner stay in the jobcenter whilst the person is interviewed, ie its not the person being interviewed that has a health problem, its the person they came with?[greenhighlight]but it matters when the most senior politician in the land is happy to use language and examples that are simply not true.
[/greenhighlight][redtitle]
The impact of this is to stigmatise people on benefits,
and we should be deeply worried about that[/redtitle](house of lords debate, talking about Cameron)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards