Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Digital Camera for <£70?
The_One_Who
Posts: 2,418
Forumite
in Techie Stuff
I'm planning on going on an extended holiday and would like a cheap point and shoot camera, ideally for less than £70. Since I know nothing about cameras I don't need it to do a dance every time I turn it on, I just need it to take half-decent snapshots. I should probably also add that I primarily use a Mac, so something compatible with that would be good, but if not that's okay.
I have come across the:
Panasonic Lumix DMCFS42EBS 10.1MP from Argos at £60
Canon A3000 IS 10MP from Argos at £67
Both of these have rechargeable batteries, but it doesn't say whether they can be charged in-camera or if they come with a separate charging block thing. I'm not too fussed about the camera having a rechargeable battery or needing AAs, although I'm inclined to think that the rechargeable might work out better value.
Does anyone have any opinions on either of these? Or any others?
I have come across the:
Panasonic Lumix DMCFS42EBS 10.1MP from Argos at £60
Canon A3000 IS 10MP from Argos at £67
Both of these have rechargeable batteries, but it doesn't say whether they can be charged in-camera or if they come with a separate charging block thing. I'm not too fussed about the camera having a rechargeable battery or needing AAs, although I'm inclined to think that the rechargeable might work out better value.
Does anyone have any opinions on either of these? Or any others?
0
Comments
-
The Lumix takes better quality pics. Can't comment on battery life thoughpoppy100
-
Decent camera's really are cheap. I can't remember the exact model I got my mum about a year ago, but looks like this one and around the same price, so I reccomend this:
Samsung ES17 / 12.2 Megapixel / 3x Optical Zoom / 2.5 inch LCD / Digital Camera / Black - £54.29
You can also get cashback from topcashback. If you don't already use topcashback then I can PM you my referal if your a kind person
But the camera itself is very good. The resolution isn't professional quality, but it's very good quality and can handle a drunken drop
Thought for the day: each generation of mankind tends to hug the illusion of having reached the culmination of human achievement. Yet, as we scoff at our groping ancestors, so our descendants will surely scoff at us.
-C.F Harriss - Worthing at War - August 17 19410 -
The Lumix takes better quality pics. Can't comment on battery life though
I'm not sure that's true. The Canon, which I have has better features such as optical image stabilization and generally seems to do a good job (just needs the sharpening setting changed). The battery seems to last a long time before recharging as well. The Lumix is an entry level model. I imagine there's not a great deal of difference in picture quality but the optical image stabilization will reduce fuzziness.0 -
Thanks everyone. I've done a side-by-side comparision on here and it seems like the Canon does have a better spec, or at least slightly higher numbers, and has the image stabilisation.
Any other advice or opinions?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
