Office 2003, 2007 and 2010

epm-84

free4440273 wrote: »

Office 2010 -- far superior to 2003/2007 //

Except Outlook 2010 is inferior to Outlook 2003 when displaying HTML emails.

free4440273

epm-84 wrote: »

Except Outlook 2010 is inferior to Outlook 2003 when displaying HTML emails.

Really/ hadn't noticed that/ maybe it's a settings change ?

WhiteChristmas

etorm wrote: »

I got office 2007 for £15 from work with the HUP a couple of years ago on it and claimed the £15 back on expenses.

...and for which constituency are you the honourable member, pray tell?

AlwaysSomething

free4440273 wrote: »

Office 2010 -- far superior to 2003/2007 //

Can you tell me some of the things you like about Office 2010. I have been a heavy user for more than 10 years. I am reluctantly moving from 2003 to 2007 because so many other users are using 2007. I preferred the user interface of 2003, and haven't really found anything I prefer about 2007. What am I going to like about 2010 compared to 2007. If it's better, then I might as well skip straight to 2010.
Thanks

free4440273

AlwaysSomething wrote: »

Can you tell me some of the things you like about Office 2010. I have been a heavy user for more than 10 years. I am reluctantly moving from 2003 to 2007 because so many other users are using 2007. I preferred the user interface of 2003, and haven't really found anything I prefer about 2007. What am I going to like about 2010 compared to 2007. If it's better, then I might as well skip straight to 2010.
Thanks

http://download.microsoft.com/download/E/A/8/EA8E6423-3DFE-4FEF-8482-D48B016A7C03/Office2010SuiteandVersionComparisonGuide.pdf

epm-84

free4440273 wrote: »

Really/ hadn't noticed that/ maybe it's a settings change ?

Outlook 2007 and 2010 uses Microsoft Word to render HTML emails opposed to Outlook 2003 which uses Internet Explorer. This means greater compatibility with Word but some nice features that worked in Outlook 2003 don't work in Outlook 2007 and 2010, such as animation and fancy things with images.