We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
How do I prove?
Comments
-
To starbright:
I don't think it was so much a question of you lending a large chunk of your savings to pay for your sister's essential surgery that got people going.
It was the suggestion you made as a follow-up, that you thought you should be able to claim housing benefit as a result. This, I am afraid, is what most of us who are ordinary British taxpayers will take exception to. By the way, before you start telling me how long and how hard you've worked, let me tell you that I worked from ages 16 to 67 apart from 3 years out to have children, I even worked every summer while at university, and my DH worked continuously from 16 to 67. We're now 71, still paying tax, and neither of us has ever claimed Housing Benefit. We're not entitled to any benefits - our income is too high.
If I had relatives in another country whom I could help with use of savings, yes, I'd do it, no question. But I wouldn't then expect the taxpayer to bail me out by claiming Housing Benefit.
Margaret[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
Before I found wisdom, I became old.0 -
Hi Starbright.
As Margaret Clare says, no-one is saying you shouldn't help your relative.
It's the claiming Housing Benefit afterwards that is the problem.
What you spend your money on is your own affair, but don't then expect the benefit system to subsidise it.
I wish you and your Sister-in-law well.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
Others should be aware, when reading post #9 that is a question of what the Decision Maker considers reasonable, given their circumstances
In the past people with a diagnosis of SAD have been treated as if they had "intentionally deprived" themselves of capital by having a Winter holiday.
Others who have paid off a credit card debt faster than was legally required have also got into trouble. While many, including me, would consider both the above spends reasonable, it can be extremely difficult managing your finances while you wait to argue the case at appeal.
It follows that if you are going to spend savings or capital in a way which others may regard as "unreasonable given your circumstances" you keep a record of exactly how the money was spent and the reasons why you did so.
If you are convinced your actions are reasonable then you will be able to appeal any decision to withhold benefit and be confident when presenting your case before an appeal tribunal.My weight loss following Doktor Dahlqvist' Dietary Program
Start 23rd Jan 2008 14st 9lbs Current 10st 12lbs0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
