We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Barclays Shares

2»

Comments

  • Buzza2009 wrote: »
    Ok, thanks for your help. Im thinking of buying them from Halifax share dealing account. Would you recommend any different sites?

    Thanks once again.

    iii.co.uk are the cheapest, if you set the trade the day before its only £1.50!
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 8 January 2011 at 8:48AM
    Thats same as halifax pretty much


    Barclays went 50p-£3 in two years, Lloyds do have more issues


    lloyds can never go back to 300, the two banks are very different

    im new to buying shares
    Dont buy one single high risk share as your first try. Barclays is one of the worlds largest investment banks, half of it is based on wall street. Many parts of it are spread around the world also in places like zimbawae

    Could be this is the year for banks to regain alot, I have thought that. In that case I recommend you find a fund which is very highly invested in barclays in its portfolio, let a manager handle the risk and trade them for you.
    A fund is much less high risk and will own more then one share, single shares should be in the minority for anyone new

    http://www.bestinvest.co.uk/investment-research/fund-research/search/comment.aspx?FundType=UnitTrustAndOeic&FundName=Financials


    Range for Barc for last 18 months has been 250 to 390. Yes its towards the bottom of that but I think if you do buy one share, buy it more then once. 12 purchases over the next twelve months would improve your chances of an average gain, regular invest charge is 1.50 as mentioned
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,922 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    lloyds can never go back to 300, the two banks are very different
    Not sure I agree with that, maybe it will take some time but you'd certainly expect with inflation that it will reach that point sometime in the future.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • fullstop
    fullstop Posts: 545 Forumite
    6022tivo wrote: »
    Unfortunately the government have a agenda with bankers bonuses and this will cause issues for banks, as the best traders and bankers will move offshore.... Best to avoid UK banks for investment at the moment.

    Don't really understand how a government can tell a private company what it can and can't pay an employee, but anyway.

    It is sad that most of the country are blaming a handful of bankers for the issues the last government left us in... All smoke and mirrors...

    Would not put much faith on what any government ministers this lot or the last lot say about bonus payouts, they are pretty powerless to stop them.

    They could alter the tax system , but they will always find ways round any new rules.
    "When the Government borrows, the citizen has to save".

    Machiavellii
  • ses6jwg
    ses6jwg Posts: 5,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    jimjames wrote: »
    Not sure I agree with that, maybe it will take some time but you'd certainly expect with inflation that it will reach that point sometime in the future.


    unless they signficiantly reduce the amount of shares in circulation it is impossible
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 8 January 2011 at 2:28PM
    with inflation that it will reach that point sometime in the future.
    Lloyds has 68 billion shares in issue. If we valued them today at £3 each they'd be the largest bank in the world.
    I agree inflation will likely help them in a few ways, thats why its there to the detriment of anyone relying on cash

    Here is a float adjusted graph for Lloyds which suggests 200 would match an absolute full recovery of fortunes

    lloyfall.png




    So LLOY has 12x the amount of shares now then in 2007 and BARC is 1.9x
    If we gauge them on price, BARC is the one relatively more accurate to do so.


    lloy.png


    barck.jpg



    http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/1391/graphcgicodelecotnlloyl.png
    http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/860/graphcgicodelecotnlloy.png
    http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/860/graphcgicodelecotnlloy.png
    http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/860/graphcgicodelecotnlloy.png
    http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/1391/graphcgicodelecotnlloyl.png
  • IronWolf
    IronWolf Posts: 6,445 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ses6jwg wrote: »
    unless they signficiantly reduce the amount of shares in circulation it is impossible

    Not impossible at all, Ive seen far worse companies valued far more outrageously
    Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 9 January 2011 at 10:09AM
    Ive not seen many 200bn uk companies.
    Would be nice if the world loved our companies to put that much money into them, we dont have the money so it would have to be foreigners. If anything HMG is a seller asap, big supply on any potential demand does not suggest a high valuation

    Right now Lloyds is not estimated to be that profitable, if they had that much power over uk banking they'd be split at that point in fact that could be proposed this year I think hence Im waiting for LLOY to drop below 60 really.

    For the risk I expect a cheaper price, I do think they'll come good eventually but not without alot of doubts first


    Better estimates out there then me, this guy sums up some of the uk banking valuations:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=7d5E1ZPnEi8#t=577s
  • But as the banks restructure and return to profitability I thought the idea was that HMG 'sell' the shares back to the bank who return their money and destroy the shares, thus reducing the number in circulation?
    If I had a pound for every pound I'd lost, I'd be confused
  • Dont buy one single high risk share as your first try. Barclays is one of the worlds largest investment banks, half of it is based on wall street. Many parts of it are spread around the world also in places like zimbawae

    Could be this is the year for banks to regain alot, I have thought that. In that case I recommend you find a fund which is very highly invested in barclays in its portfolio, let a manager handle the risk and trade them for you.
    A fund is much less high risk and will own more then one share, single shares should be in the minority for anyone new

    http://www.bestinvest.co.uk/investment-research/fund-research/search/comment.aspx?FundType=UnitTrustAndOeic&FundName=Financials


    Range for Barc for last 18 months has been 250 to 390. Yes its towards the bottom of that but I think if you do buy one share, buy it more then once. 12 purchases over the next twelve months would improve your chances of an average gain, regular invest charge is 1.50 as mentioned

    Personally I will take the risk thanks. I am not investing more than I can afford to lose.... well nobody can afford to lose money but it is savings not earmarked for anything. I have recently read 'The Naked Trader' which in many ways mirrors my thinking before reading the book and I'd rather take the advice of someone who has made hundreds of thousands trading shares himself (who asks why you would want to pay commission to someone else) than someone unknown on here, no disrespect to anyone but the forums are awash with people giving advice, including me, and if we were all right.... well we can't be!

    The government will want out of Lloyds and RBS eventually, and the shares in circulation will reduce. If I can double my money over a couple of years or even three then that is fine! If meanwhile Lloyds goes down past 60p I will take the loss and buy back in when it starts to move back up. I don't see this happening though, but admit it is a possibility.

    We shall see.
    If I had a pound for every pound I'd lost, I'd be confused
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.