We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

child benefit

evening all

just wondering if someone can help me with a query on the new child benefit that starts in april 2011

from what i have read if both parents are working like me and my partner do then as long as our joint income is less than £80k or there about a year we still get it.

which our will be a lot less than that,

my question is - i earn £9k a year but what happens if my partner say went over the £43,875 into the 40% tax bracket would be still get it because less than £80k or will we lose it as his wage has gone over into the next tax bracket

tried to google it but boy there is no where i can find that can give a straight forward answer

going to try and call them tomorrow to see if i can find out just its bugging me now

thanks in advance
steph
always looking for a bargin

Comments

  • arent the changes from 2012?
  • I thought if one of you got 40 thousand a year it stops but if you got say 20 each you still get it x
    Extra earning 2012 From Surveys Etc

    Pure-profile £50...Valued 80..Onepoll £120
    Panelbase £33.00...Shop/Scan £40..Crowd £18.00..PO £10.45..Spring £20..voice £20
    IPSOS £30...My survey £5..Ebay Sales £350
    Pine £21..JTA £5..RO £20..RewardO£20..Wonder £5.O Bar £31
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,576 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Not till 2013.

    The plan is that from 2013 child benefit won't be paid if either of the parents pays higher rate tax. Which means if one earns £45k and the other earns nothing they'd get no child ben but if they both earn £40k each ie £80 combined they would get it. An extreme comparison but highlights the unfairness - reason for it is that's it's easier than some means test on joint income as they know who the higher rate payers are.

    It sounds as daft as Gordon Brown's plan 10 years ago to tax child benefit for higher rate tax payers - which people pointed out was unworkable due to independant taxation. This plan has the same problems.

    I suspect they'll do the same as Brown and drop it - maybe replacing it with a lowering of the higher rate threshold or something - which would be fairer as childless people would pay too - a lot of the burden of the spending review is falling on families on average'ish incomes
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.