We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Helping mum...

13»

Comments

  • Caz3121
    Caz3121 Posts: 15,917 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You will probably get more help on the benefits board but there are 3 points
    1) you cannot claim housing benefit for a property that you previously owned unless you had no option to sell..eg to avoid reposession
    2) by selling for under market value she will have given away money as stated above by silvercar
    3) paying non-priority debts off (eg credit cards) would be classed as still having the money
  • ViolaLass
    ViolaLass Posts: 5,764 Forumite
    mikmo wrote: »
    I think it's key to note that the LHA payments claimed would only be what she'd be entitled to if she and my dependent brother moved to a suitable 2 bed house in the area.

    There is no additional burden on the tax payer as suggested by some of the inflamed comments of others. As she can't afford the mortgage she will be moving to LHA and either renting from a private land lord... or renting the house from me (with the same level of LHA support) and me covering the additonal cost of the current house vs a smaller 2 bed.

    That doesn't add up. If she were to sell, she would have a lot more money in the bank once all her debts were paid and might well not be entitled to the LHA support. So yes, she is trying to shift the burden to the tax payer.
    mikmo wrote: »
    I'm not 100% certain I'll require a BTL mortgage, again something to be discussed with LHA.

    You intend to let the property long term ergo you need a BTL mortgage. Where's the difficulty?

    And given that you and your mother are considering setting this tenancy up specifically so that she can claim more benefit money, you will struggle to argue that it is not contrived.
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    silvercar wrote: »
    Some lenders will be quite happy with someone obtaining a mortgage to house a parent.
    Can't have it both ways - if the property is to be seen as a "commercial" let, so that LHA payments can be received, then a BTL mortgage is the way to proceed.
    mikmo wrote: »
    I think it's key to note that the LHA payments claimed would only be what she'd be entitled to if she and my dependent brother moved to a suitable 2 bed house in the area.

    There is no additional burden on the tax payer as suggested by some of the inflamed comments of others. As she can't afford the mortgage she will be moving to LHA and either renting from a private land lord... or renting the house from me (with the same level of LHA support) and me covering the additonal cost of the current house vs a smaller 2 bed.

    Run that one by us again? Your mother has a mortgage of 90k on a property which you reckon is worth 250k, ie there is equity of £160k which would be released by a sale. Why should someone who can release that level of capital from the sale of their property think it's okay for LHA to fund their living costs? Why could she not just buy a property that is within her means?
    mikmo wrote: »
    I'm not 100% certain I'll require a BTL mortgage, again something to be discussed with LHA. I have factored in the additional costs. This isn't a profit making exercise for me so not hugely relevant.
    As someone else has pointed out it's not the Benefit Office who determine the mortgage product , it's your potential Lender.

    You say it isn't a profit-making exercise for you, yet the deal for you would be that you end up with a property purchased from your mother at a considerable discount.

    Further down the line, what happens to your brother when your mother is no longer around and the major "family" asset has passed solely to you at that knock down price?
  • I would have thought that as the OP plans to acquire a £250k property for a knock-down £120k they could fund the mortgage payments themselves and let Mum and Bro live there rent-free. Now, that's what I'd call an investment
  • Star1
    Star1 Posts: 90 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Are you married, or do you plan to get married at any point? If so and you ever get divorced, remember that the house will be an asset and included in any divorce settlement

    Also, as others have pointed out, google deprivation of assets in relation to benefits - your mother will be assumed to have the money in the bank relating to the 'gift' and to the additional £30k she's planning to use to pay off debts / go travelling so she wouldn't be able to claim means-tested benefits anyway
  • mikmo
    mikmo Posts: 10 Forumite
    Cheers for the answers guys, really helpful.

    Clearly a lot of un-resolved issues for me to think about, many of which may make this un-workable.

    I'll book a sit down with the LHA to discuss the issues raised.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.