We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
I'm switching to Handelsbanken
Comments
-
Faster payments?I think....0
-
Faster than what?0
-
Faster payments is the name of an RTGS payment system, single payments of up to £10k can be sent via it and reach the beneficiary immediately.0
-
http://www.handelsbanken.co.uk/shb/inet/icentrb.nsf/vlookuppics/1_news_gf_2010_safest_banks/$file/gf_worlds50safestbanks2010.pdf - Try this link if your sceptical about how safe they are.
If you wanted safety, you would have been better off opening an account with HSBC/First Direct.
However, all surveys such as the one you linked too are flawed in some way.. for instance this one rates Santander as higher than HSBC - which is very odd...
Regards
Sunil0 -
... or Halifax, or Nationwide, or Barclays, or, in fact, anyone who is part of the FSCS.
Well isn't it only HSBC (Including First Direct of course as it's part of the HSBC Group) in the UK who hold more deposits than loans. I'm sure they pointed this out to me when I went in during the credit crunch when other banks were going belly up.0 -
However, all surveys such as the one you linked too are flawed in some way.. for instance this one rates Santander as higher than HSBC - which is very odd...
What's even odder is that it includes several of the German Landesbanks. These institutions were known to have problems long before the credit crunch and have been teering precariously since. The German government declined to offer a proper bailout and instead have done a good job of sweeping it under the carpet.0 -
... or Halifax, or Nationwide, or Barclays, or, in fact, anyone who is part of the FSCS.
I wasn't talking about getting your money back via the FSCS but as Huw01 points out the strength of the underlying institution itself.
HSBC being the only large financial institution in the UK and one of the few globally to lend less money then it has in deposits.. hence it has no need to have high savings rates - as it doesn't need the funds. A lower interest rate being another good indicator of less risk.
This is the same reason that Jinkster stated that Handelsbanken gave him, though its a much smaller institution.
I would be interested in how Jinkster finds Handelsbanken- its been mentioned on these boards very occasionally but like others I had the impression it was looking a very specific/asset rich client base.
Regards
Sunil0 -
I'm not sure why there is so much confidence in FSA schemes.
All HM Government will do if a failure occurs is to print more money to cover it so in the end,we all pay.Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..0 -
C_Mababejive wrote: »I'm not sure why there is so much confidence in FSA schemes.
All HM Government will do if a failure occurs is to print more money to cover it so in the end,we all pay.
As a depositer, would you rather lose your money or suffer a bit of inflation?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
