We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Win 7 - 32 bit or 64 bit

I'm looking at buying a new Dell desktop and I'm being offered Win 7 32 bit as standard or a cost free upgrade to 64 bit. I've no idea what the difference is, what difference would it make and do I want it?!!
«1

Comments

  • JasX
    JasX Posts: 3,996 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    yes get it
  • wadewade wrote: »
    I'm looking at buying a new Dell desktop and I'm being offered Win 7 32 bit as standard or a cost free upgrade to 64 bit. I've no idea what the difference is, what difference would it make and do I want it?!!

    Take the cost free upgrade.

    Win 7 32bit can only have/see upto 4GB of RAM.

    64bit can see much much more (not that you'd need it at the moment but its good for future proofing).
  • GeoffX
    GeoffX Posts: 417 Forumite
    100 Posts
    Unless you have some ancient 16 bit software you can't find a better version of - essentially Windows 3.1 stuff from the early nineties - then go for the 64 bit version. I expected problems using it and have had none of any consequence.
  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 14,304 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I would suggest that if the machine can (or is going to) have more than 3.5 GB memory then go for the 64-bit version; if not there may not be much gain in doing so.
    Microsoft recommend the 32-bit versions of their apps (eg. Office) even on the 64-bit platform, so there's no difference there.
    The only potential negative is whether there are native 64-bit drivers for the components on the machine and the peripherals that will be attached.
  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 14,304 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you need older apps, you can use VMware to create a separate virtual machine to run them in.
  • free4440273
    free4440273 Posts: 38,438 Forumite
    BLOODBATH IN THE EVENING THEN? :shocked: OR PERHAPS THE AFTERNOON? OR THE MORNING? OH, FORGET THIS MALARKEY!

    THE KILLERS :cool:

    THE PUNISHER :dance: MATURE CHEDDAR ADDICT:cool:
  • rockitup
    rockitup Posts: 677 Forumite
    Sorry to jump in on this thread, but would the same advice apply in my situation please?

    I just splashed the cash on an iMAC with 8 GB Ram and i7 Processor.

    Will be using Parallels 6 to run a just a few Windows programmes mostly share dealing programmes like Sharescope.

    I read that I can set about half the Ram to run in the Parallels so around 4 Gb so do you reckon I should go for 64 bit and future proof my machine (in case I win loads money on the share and can upgrade to 16 Gb some time in the future?)

    Thanks
  • Just so you know, not all Win7 64 versions are the same - they have various memory limits so just bear that in mind before going mad with the RAM.
    • Starter: 8GB
    • Home Basic: 8GB
    • Home Premium: 16GB
    • Professional: 192GB
    • Enterprise: 192GB
    • Ultimate: 192GB
  • rockitup wrote: »
    Sorry to jump in on this thread, but would the same advice apply in my situation please?

    I just splashed the cash on an iMAC with 8 GB Ram and i7 Processor.

    Will be using Parallels 6 to run a just a few Windows programmes mostly share dealing programmes like Sharescope.

    I read that I can set about half the Ram to run in the Parallels so around 4 Gb so do you reckon I should go for 64 bit and future proof my machine (in case I win loads money on the share and can upgrade to 16 Gb some time in the future?)

    Thanks

    Why deliberately dilute / confuse wadewade 's thread, then immediately apologise ?

    It would be less work, less words, and use up less of the worlds supply of commas to do the proper thing and start a new thread.

    That way only one thread would be polluted by the inevitable swarm of phanbhoys that will descend on any poor soul that wants to talk Mac :eek:
    Disclaimer : Everything I write on this forum is my opinion. I try to be an even-handed poster and accept that you at times may not agree with these opinions or how I choose to express them, this is not my problem. The Disabled : If years cannot be added to their lives, at least life can be added to their years - Alf Morris - ℜ
  • rockitup
    rockitup Posts: 677 Forumite
    Why deliberately dilute / confuse wadewade 's thread, then immediately apologise ?

    It would be less work, less words, and use up less of the worlds supply of commas to do the proper thing and start a new thread.

    That way only one thread would be polluted by the inevitable swarm of phanbhoys that will descend on any poor soul that wants to talk Mac :eek:

    I won't do it again Mr Gates, I promise and thanks for your most unhelpful reply
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.