We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Amazingly Niave Theory

123578

Comments

  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No, not if the banks don't lend recklessly, and people don't borrow recklessly, causing the economy to implode. The only reason prices increased is because of lax credit control. Banks shouldn't have been encouraged, and they should have been allowed to fail. A hard lesson, but one that needs to be learned.
    effective demand....

    let google be your friend and find out what it means...
  • FATBALLZ
    FATBALLZ Posts: 5,146 Forumite
    Linton wrote: »
    Equal opportunity and enjoyment has nothing to do with it - welcome to the real world of market forces.

    I agree, hence why I questioned the analogy that implied such a situation.
  • Joeskeppi wrote: »
    Property prices could remain static, the property ladder would still exist.

    Of course, otherwise how will the mortgage brokers, surveyors, solicitors and estates agencies make their commissions?

    Oh, and the government don't want to lose all that lovely stamp duty.

    Not to mention the BBC might have to change it's programming schedule...

    Way too many VIs to see any sense any time soon, I agree.
  • diable
    diable Posts: 5,258 Forumite

    Oh, and the government don't want to lose all that lovely stamp duty.

    They will just move the goal posts as they always do when they need to win votes or increase revenue errr tax
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    FATBALLZ wrote: »
    Certainly more than I believe that the property market is akin to a lovely happy ferris wheel where everyone gets equal opportunity and enjoyment. Unless Hamish ommitted to mention the ferris wheel is lubricated with oil created by grinding down the bodies of the post-1980 generation.

    House prices doubled between 1987 and 1990 as did interest rates from 7.5% to 15% it wasn't all Eldorado :)
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • chucky wrote: »
    effective demand....

    let google be your friend and find out what it means...

    Stop being obtuse, make an argument, and try to support it. Please explain how, if finance does not exist to support it (as it should not have if we were to have avoided the current ongoing crisis), house prices will continue to outstrip wage inflation.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 30 December 2010 at 10:24AM
    Stop being obtuse, make an argument, and try to support it. Please explain how, if finance does not exist to support it (as it should not have if we were to have avoided the current ongoing crisis), house prices will continue to outstrip wage inflation.
    who's obtuse??? me???

    it's you who doesn't know how to use Google or even understand demand where it is the desire of someone to pay for something combined with the ability to pay and also the willingness to pay at a point in time.

    it really is quite simple.
  • FATBALLZ wrote: »
    Certainly more than I believe that the property market is akin to a lovely happy ferris wheel where everyone gets equal opportunity and enjoyment. Unless Hamish ommitted to mention the ferris wheel is lubricated with oil created by grinding down the bodies of the post-1980 generation.

    I never said everyone gets equal opportunity and enjoyment.

    I said that all property wealth is ultimately redistributed to the following generations. Always has been, always will be.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • Please explain how, if finance does not exist to support it, house prices will continue to outstrip wage inflation.

    As population increases, and we fail to build enough houses, then the only possible outcome is more people per house.

    More people per house = more income per house. Whether that income is through wages or benefits is of no relevance, on average, 3 people living in a house will result in a higher household income than 1 person living in a house.

    Supporting higher rents, and thus higher return on investment, and ultimately attracting more capital seeking a return.

    Rents have been soaring all year, and are now at record high levels. The process is already happening. You just refuse to see it. ;)
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • As population increases, and we fail to build enough houses, then the only possible outcome is more people per house.

    More people per house = more income per house. Whether that income is through wages or benefits is of no relevance, on average, 3 people living in a house will result in a higher household income than 1 person living in a house.

    Supporting higher rents, and thus higher return on investment, and ultimately attracting more capital seeking a return.

    Rents have been soaring all year, and are now at record high levels. The process is already happening. You just refuse to see it. ;)

    Ah, so turning places into slums will make houses more profitable, I see thats clear now, thanks. This utopian future sounds like the sort of place that is going to have a great economy, and thus more income for people to blow on smaller and smaller dwellings.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.