We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Solicitor mistake - should we ask for refund of fees?

MascaraMinx
Posts: 380 Forumite


Here's the situation; the title deeds to our house should be in my husbands name. He bought the property several years ago with his ex. They split up soon after movig in, and he bought her out of the mortgage. We got our draft contract through the other day for the sale of the house and it shows his ex as still on the title deeds. My OH phoned up our solicitor who confirmed that the land registry was never updated. He then contacted his old solicitors, and they said they would amend this straight away but it will take 7 - 10 days for the update to take place, which adds at least a 2 week delay until our solicitor can draw up the contracts in just his name.
I feel that as my OH paid the solicitors good money for their services, and that this has theoretically added a delay to our current transaction, we should have some sort of recourse against the original solicitor such as a reimbursement of the fees he paid? What do you think?
I feel that as my OH paid the solicitors good money for their services, and that this has theoretically added a delay to our current transaction, we should have some sort of recourse against the original solicitor such as a reimbursement of the fees he paid? What do you think?
0
Comments
-
They made a mistake, they are rectifying it, you would be within your rights to claim any costs directly incurred by the mistake but would have to prove they are wholly and soley a result of the mistake.
Personally what I think, it's a mistake, it's being put right, no harm is done so just live with it.
People seem to be in such a hurry to blame and litigate nowadays, what's 14 days in the grand scheme of things?0 -
Alan_M wrote:People seem to be in such a hurry to blame and litigate nowadays, what's 14 days in the grand scheme of things?
I knew someone was going to suggest I am being greedy.
fact is, solicitors charge a lot in fees for a professional service. Something like this is adding a delay at the point where we would like to have been exchanging. It is adding to a fraught and stressful process and we are both scared of letting the other parties know there is to be a further delay as it just seems to be one thing after another. I think it's shocking that her name is still on there0 -
Send a letter to their complaints department, and they might offer you something for your troubles.Money is much more exciting than anything it buys.0
-
Perhaps it's not worth it Market Oracle. Perhaps I am just over reacting because I am stressed out. I thought it seemes quite a big deal but maybe I am distorting things!0
-
MascaraMinx wrote:I knew someone was going to suggest I am being greedy.
fact is, solicitors charge a lot in fees for a professional service. Something like this is adding a delay at the point where we would like to have been exchanging. It is adding to a fraught and stressful process and we are both scared of letting the other parties know there is to be a further delay as it just seems to be one thing after another. I think it's shocking that her name is still on there
Please highlight where I suggested you were greedy.0 -
Apologies Alan, I wasn't wishing to start an argument, I just wanted a few views on my dilemma. Perhaps a tad over sensitive on my part.0
-
I can understand Alan's response. This claims culture is getting out of hand. A mistake has been made. It hasnt cost you financially and they are putting it right at no cost to you. Mistakes happen but nowadays there is a growing culture to try and profit from mistakes. Threads on the compensation culture tend to end up quite emotive and do generate strong opinions.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
Hello,
(sorry mascaraminx, nothing to add just interested)
I was just wondering if the ex could have had some claim to the property? ie if they had lived out their days in that house, paid off all the mortgage etc? or if the ex went bankrupt? Does the solicitor have to get the ex's permission to take them off the deeds?
Sorry, just curious.....Saving for an early retirement!0 -
It hasn't cost us anything yet, but a 7 - 10 day delay at this stage is quite a set back for our chain who all want to exchange asap (offers were made an accepted in August and we've had a couple of problems recently which have made people a bit jumpy). I am not a fan of the compensation culture either, but I do feel little aggrieved here. As I say, I am totally stressed and this has just added to it. I felt that solicitors shouldn't really make mistakes like this when youhave paid good money to have it all sorted.
Imelda - I don't know, they obviously had the paperwork as they said they would send it off to the land registry straight away, so no need to contact his ex. But when the contracts arrived they were in her name too so presumably at that stage she still had rights to the property?0 -
MascaraMinx wrote:I knew someone was going to suggest I am being greedy.
fact is, solicitors charge a lot in fees for a professional service.
What on earth - do you have any idea of the paper thin margins in residential conveyancing ? It's work I should not touch with a bargepole - it's high volume low margin difficult client work - absolutely terrible legal work to be doing.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.2K Spending & Discounts
- 243.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards