We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Leasehold Extension Confusion
Options

AngieR
Posts: 15 Forumite
Hi, Just need some sound advice as I'm totally confused as to what to do for the best. Here's a quick summary:-
We own two flats in one block both have only 42 years remaining on lease (we didn't know this was a problem and no one told us it would be when we bought the flats 15 years ago). Both flats are now mortgage free meaning that for the first time in 15 years we can keep all the rent (less maintenance, tax, fees etc. etc.) We have been given two options by Freeholder:-
a) Extend lease to 125years, keep gound rent at 75 per annum - total cost 46,500k.
b) Extend lease by 90 years with with peppercorn GR - total cost 48,500k
(we understand that we could serve Notice and all that but we already have paid out such a lot on surveyor's fees etc. that we just want to finish it)
We would like to be able to sell the properties at some point in the future but not in present market.
I want to go for Option a) as I believe we would sell before the ground rent charge became more than the initial saving.
My husband wants to forget the whole thing, not extend the lease at all, carry on renting them out for 42 years and hand the keys back! (He's that fed up with the whole thing).
The point is - does he have a point? Should we just carry on as we are, will the flats to our kids and forget about the leases. Is this crazy or actually quite sensible? 50K is a lot of money to buy something we already thought was ours!!
Lastly, the flats are quite old but in a prime location in Eastbourne (if there is such a thing in Eastbourne!) - what if sometime in the future a developer came to buy the whole block and the land - would a short lease mean we would get a reduced offer from the developer?
I know this is a big posting but we really are confused - any thoughts from you all would be useful.
Thanks
We own two flats in one block both have only 42 years remaining on lease (we didn't know this was a problem and no one told us it would be when we bought the flats 15 years ago). Both flats are now mortgage free meaning that for the first time in 15 years we can keep all the rent (less maintenance, tax, fees etc. etc.) We have been given two options by Freeholder:-
a) Extend lease to 125years, keep gound rent at 75 per annum - total cost 46,500k.
b) Extend lease by 90 years with with peppercorn GR - total cost 48,500k
(we understand that we could serve Notice and all that but we already have paid out such a lot on surveyor's fees etc. that we just want to finish it)
We would like to be able to sell the properties at some point in the future but not in present market.
I want to go for Option a) as I believe we would sell before the ground rent charge became more than the initial saving.
My husband wants to forget the whole thing, not extend the lease at all, carry on renting them out for 42 years and hand the keys back! (He's that fed up with the whole thing).
The point is - does he have a point? Should we just carry on as we are, will the flats to our kids and forget about the leases. Is this crazy or actually quite sensible? 50K is a lot of money to buy something we already thought was ours!!
Lastly, the flats are quite old but in a prime location in Eastbourne (if there is such a thing in Eastbourne!) - what if sometime in the future a developer came to buy the whole block and the land - would a short lease mean we would get a reduced offer from the developer?
I know this is a big posting but we really are confused - any thoughts from you all would be useful.
Thanks
0
Comments
-
Well a ky financial question is obviously what are the flats worth now, and what would they be worth with the extended lease?
If you're paying £50K ish (incl legals etc) to extend, and the flats will only be worth £75K afterwards, well, hubby has a point!
Have a read here.0 -
I echo have a look at this website http://www.lease-advice.org/information/faqs/#LeaseExtension0
-
Consider suing the solicitor who allowed you to buy flats with only 57 years left on the lease.RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards