We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Converting to Buy to let mortgage - fees

Hi,
I have just been told by Santander they require £295 to grant me permission to let out my property, currently on a residential mortgage.

Surely this is precisely the kind of unreasonable over-charging that the banks have been pulled up for. Is there anything I can or should do to bring this rip off to the attention of officialdom?

Many thanks
«1

Comments

  • This isn't a rip off, the risk is higher, if they are willing to give you consent without increasing your interest rate you are doing very well.
    Aug 24 - Mortgage Balance £242,040.19
    Credit Card - £8,141.63 + £4,209.83
    Goals: Mortgage Free by 2035, Give up full time work once Mortgage Free, Ensure I have a pension income of £20k per year from 2035

  • <sebb>
    <sebb> Posts: 453 Forumite
    When you took out the residential mortgage you agreed that it was to be your primary residence. Now you want to change that agreement and change the risk profile for the lender. You have two choices, pay up, or go to another lender for a buy to let mortgage. Chances are the buy to let mortgage will be on substantially higher rate so you'll be better off paying the fee. Look on the bright side, they might have just refused you outright. You don't have a definitive right to rent out your house while you have a residential mortgage in place.
  • dimbo61
    dimbo61 Posts: 13,727 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Also remember that this will be for a period of time 2/3 years at most so dont complain if you get tenants long term and the lender wants you to change to a BTL
  • To offer you a different view yes it does seem to be a lot of money.
    Santander obviously feel comfortable with you as a good credit risk and if you have a fair amount of equity in the property then actually the "risk profile" to Santander is still close to zero no matter who is living in the house - Santander can always repossess the house and recover the mortgage amount plus costs.
    So the £295 is just another banking fee set at a level that "we can get away with" rather than a fee that represents any sort of value added work.
  • diable
    diable Posts: 5,258 Forumite
    Off set it against your tax bill and as other poster have mentioned you are lucky they are not charging you a higher interest rate.
  • <sebb>
    <sebb> Posts: 453 Forumite
    wonderman wrote: »
    To offer you a different view yes it does seem to be a lot of money.
    Santander obviously feel comfortable with you as a good credit risk and if you have a fair amount of equity in the property then actually the "risk profile" to Santander is still close to zero no matter who is living in the house - Santander can always repossess the house and recover the mortgage amount plus costs.
    So the £295 is just another banking fee set at a level that "we can get away with" rather than a fee that represents any sort of value added work.

    OK, but ignoring the risk profile argument, there's paperwork to deal with, investigations to be done etc. Most re-mortgage deals these days have fees attached, some as high as £1000. Why is this any different? Plus I wouldn't mind betting the OP gets to hold on to some ridiculously low rate that new borrowers don't have a hope in hell of achieving, and no one looking for a buy to let would get.

    I don't see why people believe they have the right to get round getting a buy to let mortgage by getting a residential mortgage then converting it to consent to let free of charge.
  • Thats cheap! Santander charged me £495 for the same privilege!
    ;)
  • <sebb> wrote: »
    OK, but ignoring the risk profile argument, there's paperwork to deal with, investigations to be done etc. Most re-mortgage deals these days have fees attached, some as high as £1000. Why is this any different? Plus I wouldn't mind betting the OP gets to hold on to some ridiculously low rate that new borrowers don't have a hope in hell of achieving, and no one looking for a buy to let would get.

    I don't see why people believe they have the right to get round getting a buy to let mortgage by getting a residential mortgage then converting it to consent to let free of charge.

    I agree it is not different. The mortgage arrangement fees are a rip off too. They did not exist a few years ago and when credit frees up again they will disappear again. I am afraid the banks are still being greedy greedy greedy and we are having to pay up because they are all being greedy together.
  • That's very good, both £295 and £495. I would certainly not grumble at that. I'm looking to get consent to let with Santander at the moment, I expected they would be upping the interest rate too and charging a much higher fee?
  • oscardog
    oscardog Posts: 364 Forumite
    Don't forget to tell your insurer as well!!

    You will need to change to a Landlord policy.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.